1.9 to 2.1

Big lumps of metals and spanners.

Moderators: User administrators, Moderators

User avatar
Ian Hulley
Registered user
Posts: 12661
Joined: 11 Oct 2005, 08:08
80-90 Mem No: 1323
Location: Wirksworth, Derbyshire ... or at t'mill

Re: 1.9 to 2.1

Post by Ian Hulley »

We swapped from a 1.9 DG to a 2.1 DJ and it's like having a different van altogether. I know we live in a hilly area but the 2.1 just sails up hills almost as if they weren't there. The 2.1 is slightly more economical (using the DG carb and gas coversion). Can't comment on the DF>DG question.

Ian.
The Hulley's Bus
1989 2.1DJ Trampspotter
LPG courtesy of Steve @ Gasure

Damien
Trader
Posts: 331
Joined: 02 May 2009, 16:21
80-90 Mem No: 6747
Location: Farnborough hampshire

Re: 1.9 to 2.1

Post by Damien »

Having driven your van, its comparable with my 2.0 Aircooled, i've driven a couple of DG'd vans and they are noticably better for cruising and accelerating. Bare in mind is we're not talking huge differences in power (about 18hp), but even df to a dg is about 30% up on power . I've driven 1 MV and it blew me away how good it was to drive, 112hp (when new) makes for a lot of fun in a wedge.

If you give it a 4/5 weeks i'll take you out in the MV and you can see what you think, it'll be going to farnham for MOT anyway.

User avatar
kevtherev
Registered user
Posts: 18832
Joined: 23 Oct 2005, 20:13
80-90 Mem No: 2264
Location: Country estate Wolverhampton Actually

Re: 1.9 to 2.1

Post by kevtherev »

I swapped to a 2.1 DJ from 1.9dg

I will never go back... ever
engine cost £550 from syncrospares
cost me a sunday morning to fit.
ridiculously easy to fit, did it on my own.
AGG 2.0L 8V. (Golf GTi MkIII)

User avatar
texasuk
Registered user
Posts: 171
Joined: 03 Nov 2009, 11:54
80-90 Mem No: 7673
Location: Hampshire

Re: 1.9 to 2.1

Post by texasuk »

Right. Whether right or wrong, I've sourced a 2.1 and now will need to know what I might expect to encounter when going from a DF to this.
I talked to the guy at Elite and he advised against changing from the DF, said it does fine and although I respect his advise and too a degree can see what he is saying (I don't find mine that bad, even though it is obviously worn out and probably has a head leak) I shall be going ahead with rebuilding and changing.
While he was talking he mentioned that there might be quite a few differences to think about, he said the clutch would be a different size for a start, and brackets for the exhaust.
I'm not too worried about these bits, but does anyone know of any other gotcha's it is worth thinking about?
And which is the best double carb setup? And what manifolds for them?

Lots of questions to follow I'm sure, so please allow me to imbibe of your wise knowledge and experience.

User avatar
kevtherev
Registered user
Posts: 18832
Joined: 23 Oct 2005, 20:13
80-90 Mem No: 2264
Location: Country estate Wolverhampton Actually

Re: 1.9 to 2.1

Post by kevtherev »

texasuk wrote:I'm not too worried about these bits, but does anyone know of any other gotcha's it is worth thinking about?
And which is the best double carb setup? And what manifolds for them?

Lots of questions to follow I'm sure, so please allow me to imbibe of your wise knowledge and experience.

double carb?
no need
I would use a DG manifold and a pierburg 2e3 set up for a 1.9, which are plentiful .. maybe a 2.1 gearbox (longer fourth).
AGG 2.0L 8V. (Golf GTi MkIII)

User avatar
texasuk
Registered user
Posts: 171
Joined: 03 Nov 2009, 11:54
80-90 Mem No: 7673
Location: Hampshire

Re: 1.9 to 2.1

Post by texasuk »

I know what you are saying, but I'd like to go a bit further with the search for more power. So unless there is so little gain from a 2 carb setup that it really wouldn't be worth it, I'd like to try it.

I'm definitely thinking about gearing, but as I still have to find my choice of wheel/tyre I'll put it to one side for a bit. I would expect to change it though.

Damien
Trader
Posts: 331
Joined: 02 May 2009, 16:21
80-90 Mem No: 6747
Location: Farnborough hampshire

Re: 1.9 to 2.1

Post by Damien »

Twin 40 idf's, know a guy with a pair sat on the shelf :wink: , project they were going to go on has been sold :(

Have you seen this?

https://club8090.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.p ... 2&start=60

Mr baxter as usual talks some sense, even if he hates WBX's.

Looking at the 2.1 at work a good free flowing exhaust shouldn't be a problem to knock up.

User avatar
Ian Hulley
Registered user
Posts: 12661
Joined: 11 Oct 2005, 08:08
80-90 Mem No: 1323
Location: Wirksworth, Derbyshire ... or at t'mill

Re: 1.9 to 2.1

Post by Ian Hulley »

kevtherev wrote: double carb?
no need
I would use a DG manifold and a pierburg 2e3 set up for a 1.9, which are plentiful .. maybe a 2.1 gearbox (longer fourth).


Give up Kev, it's getting like Saxo Central in here, common sense has little if any place anymore.
The Hulley's Bus
1989 2.1DJ Trampspotter
LPG courtesy of Steve @ Gasure

User avatar
kevtherev
Registered user
Posts: 18832
Joined: 23 Oct 2005, 20:13
80-90 Mem No: 2264
Location: Country estate Wolverhampton Actually

Re: 1.9 to 2.1

Post by kevtherev »

saxo central..

:rofl
AGG 2.0L 8V. (Golf GTi MkIII)

User avatar
texasuk
Registered user
Posts: 171
Joined: 03 Nov 2009, 11:54
80-90 Mem No: 7673
Location: Hampshire

Re: 1.9 to 2.1

Post by texasuk »

Don't give up Kev, I value your advice. I expect there are a wide range of views on what people want from their vans.

User avatar
kevtherev
Registered user
Posts: 18832
Joined: 23 Oct 2005, 20:13
80-90 Mem No: 2264
Location: Country estate Wolverhampton Actually

Re: 1.9 to 2.1

Post by kevtherev »

Indeed
my advice tends to gravitate to the "easy done tried and tested"
AGG 2.0L 8V. (Golf GTi MkIII)

User avatar
Ian Hulley
Registered user
Posts: 12661
Joined: 11 Oct 2005, 08:08
80-90 Mem No: 1323
Location: Wirksworth, Derbyshire ... or at t'mill

Re: 1.9 to 2.1

Post by Ian Hulley »

kevtherev wrote:Indeed
my advice tends to gravitate to the "easy done tried and tested"

Likewise, if over the past 6 years I've broken it and fixed it (or helped others fix it) then I'll comment.

As for the twin carbs .. you wouldn't believe the number of folks who've ditched their Pierburg carb for a Weber or whatever and then you see them back on here asking about their issues with the new carb set-up.

Ian.
The Hulley's Bus
1989 2.1DJ Trampspotter
LPG courtesy of Steve @ Gasure

jason k
Registered user
Posts: 938
Joined: 13 Nov 2005, 09:35
80-90 Mem No: 1959
Location: aberdare south wales

Re: 1.9 to 2.1

Post by jason k »

ah but most of those probs of which you speak are with single weber replacements for the pierburg

the dual twin choke conversion is a very good option.

its costly and will need setting on a rolling road too....
98 Westfalia James Cook

User avatar
toomanytoys
Trader
Posts: 2872
Joined: 11 Oct 2005, 18:37
80-90 Mem No: 41
Location: Boston area, South Lincolnshire

Re: 1.9 to 2.1

Post by toomanytoys »

See what code your box is, as most DF engined vans had slightly taller gearing as the engine doesnt ref as high and produces reasonable torque..

DO NOT us the DF manifold etc as it will restrict performance..

USE a DG dizzy....... either with the dg carb/manifold etc or witht he twin carbs..

If you use the twin carbs DO get them dyno'd and set up properly...

No the overall power isnt a huge amount higher.. DF 60, DG 78, MV 95 (wuto 89), DJ 112........ but the torque is the bonus..

Need to get a DG carbed 2.1 on the dyno to see what its really producing.. soon will do.. :ok
Last edited by toomanytoys on 20 Mar 2010, 09:28, edited 1 time in total.

jason k
Registered user
Posts: 938
Joined: 13 Nov 2005, 09:35
80-90 Mem No: 1959
Location: aberdare south wales

Re: 1.9 to 2.1

Post by jason k »

mv is 95 horse simon!! :D :lol: :wink:
98 Westfalia James Cook

Locked