Digijet or Digifant?

Big lumps of metals and spanners.

Moderators: User administrators, Moderators

Locked
User avatar
randomad
Registered user
Posts: 1
Joined: 30 Jan 2008, 00:33

Digijet or Digifant?

Post by randomad »

Can anyone tell me how to identify a 2.1 engine as Digijet or Digifant? Also what are the pros and cons of the two sytems?? :?:
:trunk
"If you can't fix it with a hammer, you've got an electrical problem!"
Keepin' the dream alive - since1981.

User avatar
eatcustard
Registered user
Posts: 1817
Joined: 27 Oct 2008, 07:26
80-90 Mem No: 6062
Contact:

Re: Digijet or Digifant?

Post by eatcustard »

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digifant_E ... ent_system" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.penguinjones.co.uk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; PM me for your 10% discount

User avatar
bigherb
Registered user
Posts: 2581
Joined: 27 Mar 2008, 13:50
80-90 Mem No: 5789
Location: West Kent

Re: Digijet or Digifant?

Post by bigherb »

In short a Digijet is electronic fuel injection with a separate electronic ignition, Digifant is combined programed ignition and fuel injection with a catalyst although this may have been removed, MV engine code uses Digifant and DJ Digijet. Digifant give more precise control of the injection and ignition giving better running and marginally better fuel consumption with the disadvantage everything is controlled from the ECU which may have to be replaced for either an ignition or injection fault. Digijet and Digifant where VW's adaption of Bosch Jetronic and Motronic systems.
1982 Camper 1970 1500 Beetle Various Skoda's, Ariel Arrow

User avatar
randomad
Registered user
Posts: 1
Joined: 30 Jan 2008, 00:33

Re: Digijet or Digifant?

Post by randomad »

Thanks guy's - great info. So for dummies - Digijet has a distributor and Digifant has a box of electrickeryonics? Digifant is technically more advanced, gives better running, and better mpg but when things go wrong its more complicated - yes??
Is there any difference in power and/or torque between the two systems? And, - off on a bit of a wild one here - how about ditching the lot and going carb ? :?: ?

:rollin
"If you can't fix it with a hammer, you've got an electrical problem!"
Keepin' the dream alive - since1981.

User avatar
ermie571
Registered user
Posts: 4970
Joined: 11 Oct 2005, 11:11
80-90 Mem No: 2129
Location: Minster-on-Sea, Kent: Member 2129 07784052288

Re: Digijet or Digifant?

Post by ermie571 »

Don't laugh - several members have 2.1 with carbs - we have 3! All running LPG so carb is absolutely fine. Ok on petrol too - but put super unleaded in coz that's what the 2.1 likes!

Em
x
2.1 DJ 1990 Caravelle (died and gone to heaven)
2.0 AGG (1997 ish) 1984 transporter LPG

User avatar
eatcustard
Registered user
Posts: 1817
Joined: 27 Oct 2008, 07:26
80-90 Mem No: 6062
Contact:

Re: Digijet or Digifant?

Post by eatcustard »

Injection will always give getter MPG and running smoothness over carbs.
Injection should give more power, but not a lot.
https://www.penguinjones.co.uk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; PM me for your 10% discount

DavidPallister
Registered user
Posts: 160
Joined: 12 Apr 2008, 16:29
80-90 Mem No: 0
Location: Bridgend, Wales

Re: Digijet or Digifant?

Post by DavidPallister »

Injection tends gives a better spread of power across the rev range rather than more top end power, with better fuel consumption, making a vehicle more drivable and more ecconomical, as the electronics are constantly monitoring and adjusting things, where as a carb is basically set for a specific situation with only basic adjustments available to it. Which is why all new vehicles come with injection rather than carbs :D

Locked