1600ct to 1641

Big lumps of metals and spanners.

Moderators: User administrators, Moderators

User avatar
umgum
Registered user
Posts: 330
Joined: 17 Jul 2007, 11:53
80-90 Mem No: 3972
Location: warrington
Contact:

1600ct to 1641

Post by umgum »

has anyone done this what parts do i need
also has it made any differnece to how the van runs,speed or mpg
http://s261.photobucket.com/albums/ii67 ... bay007.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
dugcati
Registered user
Posts: 2004
Joined: 15 Aug 2007, 18:23
80-90 Mem No: 3825
Location: Debris
Contact:

Re: 1600ct to 1641

Post by dugcati »

By rights to goto 1641 I think you only need barrels and pistons and then a half turn on the mixture screw for the carb... if your up for it try taking it to 1776 - you will need to get the engine cases machines anlong with the heads though :wink:
It is by will alone that I set my 'van' in motion!

User avatar
Team28crew
Registered user
Posts: 190
Joined: 29 Jul 2008, 20:26
80-90 Mem No: 5770
Location: Wirral

Re: 1600ct to 1641

Post by Team28crew »

I did this with my bug there was a small differance but the really change in performance came when I added the twin carbs, just be certain the bottom end is ok before splashing out an Barrels and Pistons.
1986 1.9DF LeisureDrive Hi Top LPG'd by Gasure

highlander
Registered user
Posts: 199
Joined: 12 Feb 2008, 17:48
80-90 Mem No: 4860
Location: Tuckingmill Cornwall

Re: 1600ct to 1641

Post by highlander »

a perfectly tuned and balanced standard 1600 will run just as good and economical as a 1641 with standard carb.. you need to look at a package to get a good increase in power and economy... 1641 barrels and pistons and a nice pair of 36 or 40 dellorto drla's and a full flow system should do the trick... :D
He fought his first battle on the Scottish Highlands in 1536... There can only be one...

Image

reluctantartist
Registered user
Posts: 4
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 16:27
80-90 Mem No: 6478
Location: Bloomington, Indiana USA

Re: 1600ct to 1641

Post by reluctantartist »

Hi all. Being from the USA, I do not see the 1600's...so my question. What is the fuel economy and how do they drive?

A KIRK
Registered user
Posts: 359
Joined: 10 Dec 2007, 21:09
80-90 Mem No: 4538
Location: Surrey (Dorking)

Re: 1600ct to 1641

Post by A KIRK »

I get between 20 - 25 mpg from my 1641, and the only way to describe how they drive is hm slowly.
Andrew
1600 CT Aircooled life certainly isn't in the fast lane

The car in front is my crumple zone

reluctantartist
Registered user
Posts: 4
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 16:27
80-90 Mem No: 6478
Location: Bloomington, Indiana USA

Re: 1600ct to 1641

Post by reluctantartist »

I take that is 20-24 using imperial gallons. That isn't much different than the 2L. I thought it might be slightly better :shock:

Thanks

User avatar
mrhutch
Registered user
Posts: 1117
Joined: 09 Jun 2006, 09:27
80-90 Mem No: 2698
Location: Herefordshire & all over

Re: 1600ct to 1641

Post by mrhutch »

most cost effective way of increasing MPG and performance is to stick a pair of dellotos on and take to a rolling road... or stick a 2litre AC in it!
1981 Vanagon Westy Burning oil as fuel...  

User avatar
dugcati
Registered user
Posts: 2004
Joined: 15 Aug 2007, 18:23
80-90 Mem No: 3825
Location: Debris
Contact:

Re: 1600ct to 1641

Post by dugcati »

getting it LPG'd would make it cheaper to run :D
It is by will alone that I set my 'van' in motion!

User avatar
Gunslinger
Registered user
Posts: 1426
Joined: 16 Jul 2007, 14:14
80-90 Mem No: 3874
Location: 3874 Leighton Buzzard

Re: 1600ct to 1641

Post by Gunslinger »

I replaced my 2.0 for a 2.4 air cooled and get 25+ to a gallon. I figure its mainly due to the engine not working so hard especially up steep gradients

User avatar
mrhutch
Registered user
Posts: 1117
Joined: 09 Jun 2006, 09:27
80-90 Mem No: 2698
Location: Herefordshire & all over

Re: 1600ct to 1641

Post by mrhutch »

2.4 Aircooled.. more details please!
1981 Vanagon Westy Burning oil as fuel...  

User avatar
Gunslinger
Registered user
Posts: 1426
Joined: 16 Jul 2007, 14:14
80-90 Mem No: 3874
Location: 3874 Leighton Buzzard

Re: 1600ct to 1641

Post by Gunslinger »

Its a standard 2.0 bottom end with bigger barrels and piston, a fast cam and adjustable tappets rather than hydraulic.
Top end is slightly better, acceleration is much better and generally more torquey. I dont have to down shift going uphill anymore :D

reluctantartist
Registered user
Posts: 4
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 16:27
80-90 Mem No: 6478
Location: Bloomington, Indiana USA

Re: 1600ct to 1641

Post by reluctantartist »

Did you do this work yourself or is there a performance shop over there doing this? I didn't think the Air-cooled could handle being much bigger than 2L.

User avatar
Gunslinger
Registered user
Posts: 1426
Joined: 16 Jul 2007, 14:14
80-90 Mem No: 3874
Location: 3874 Leighton Buzzard

Re: 1600ct to 1641

Post by Gunslinger »

reluctantartist wrote:Did you do this work yourself or is there a performance shop over there doing this? I didn't think the Air-cooled could handle being much bigger than 2L.

It was done by a company in Erith, Kent called The Engine Shop

User avatar
Vanagonman
Registered user
Posts: 165
Joined: 30 Aug 2006, 05:52

Re: 1600ct to 1641

Post by Vanagonman »

reluctantartist wrote:I take that is 20-24 using imperial gallons. That isn't much different than the 2L. I thought it might be slightly better :shock:

Thanks

That's because we're running carbs and perhaps your 2 liter type 4 is running fool injection?

Over here in Europe almost all 2.0 Type 4s are dual carbed from the factory.
was....82 Westy, 80 Mk. 3 Transporter, 69 Bay
now....66 T1 LHD 1.6 Bus

* If you need it to arrive safe & in one piece..*
Image

Locked