1600ct to 1641
Moderators: User administrators, Moderators
- umgum
- Registered user
- Posts: 330
- Joined: 17 Jul 2007, 11:53
- 80-90 Mem No: 3972
- Location: warrington
- Contact:
1600ct to 1641
has anyone done this what parts do i need
also has it made any differnece to how the van runs,speed or mpg
also has it made any differnece to how the van runs,speed or mpg
http://s261.photobucket.com/albums/ii67 ... bay007.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- dugcati
- Registered user
- Posts: 2004
- Joined: 15 Aug 2007, 18:23
- 80-90 Mem No: 3825
- Location: Debris
- Contact:
Re: 1600ct to 1641
By rights to goto 1641 I think you only need barrels and pistons and then a half turn on the mixture screw for the carb... if your up for it try taking it to 1776 - you will need to get the engine cases machines anlong with the heads though 

It is by will alone that I set my 'van' in motion!
- Team28crew
- Registered user
- Posts: 190
- Joined: 29 Jul 2008, 20:26
- 80-90 Mem No: 5770
- Location: Wirral
Re: 1600ct to 1641
I did this with my bug there was a small differance but the really change in performance came when I added the twin carbs, just be certain the bottom end is ok before splashing out an Barrels and Pistons.
1986 1.9DF LeisureDrive Hi Top LPG'd by Gasure
-
- Registered user
- Posts: 199
- Joined: 12 Feb 2008, 17:48
- 80-90 Mem No: 4860
- Location: Tuckingmill Cornwall
Re: 1600ct to 1641
a perfectly tuned and balanced standard 1600 will run just as good and economical as a 1641 with standard carb.. you need to look at a package to get a good increase in power and economy... 1641 barrels and pistons and a nice pair of 36 or 40 dellorto drla's and a full flow system should do the trick... 

He fought his first battle on the Scottish Highlands in 1536... There can only be one...


-
- Registered user
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 16:27
- 80-90 Mem No: 6478
- Location: Bloomington, Indiana USA
Re: 1600ct to 1641
Hi all. Being from the USA, I do not see the 1600's...so my question. What is the fuel economy and how do they drive?
-
- Registered user
- Posts: 359
- Joined: 10 Dec 2007, 21:09
- 80-90 Mem No: 4538
- Location: Surrey (Dorking)
Re: 1600ct to 1641
I get between 20 - 25 mpg from my 1641, and the only way to describe how they drive is hm slowly.
Andrew
1600 CT Aircooled life certainly isn't in the fast lane
The car in front is my crumple zone
1600 CT Aircooled life certainly isn't in the fast lane
The car in front is my crumple zone
-
- Registered user
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 16:27
- 80-90 Mem No: 6478
- Location: Bloomington, Indiana USA
Re: 1600ct to 1641
I take that is 20-24 using imperial gallons. That isn't much different than the 2L. I thought it might be slightly better
Thanks

Thanks
- mrhutch
- Registered user
- Posts: 1117
- Joined: 09 Jun 2006, 09:27
- 80-90 Mem No: 2698
- Location: Herefordshire & all over
Re: 1600ct to 1641
most cost effective way of increasing MPG and performance is to stick a pair of dellotos on and take to a rolling road... or stick a 2litre AC in it!
1981 Vanagon Westy Burning oil as fuel...
- dugcati
- Registered user
- Posts: 2004
- Joined: 15 Aug 2007, 18:23
- 80-90 Mem No: 3825
- Location: Debris
- Contact:
Re: 1600ct to 1641
getting it LPG'd would make it cheaper to run 

It is by will alone that I set my 'van' in motion!
- Gunslinger
- Registered user
- Posts: 1426
- Joined: 16 Jul 2007, 14:14
- 80-90 Mem No: 3874
- Location: 3874 Leighton Buzzard
Re: 1600ct to 1641
I replaced my 2.0 for a 2.4 air cooled and get 25+ to a gallon. I figure its mainly due to the engine not working so hard especially up steep gradients
- Gunslinger
- Registered user
- Posts: 1426
- Joined: 16 Jul 2007, 14:14
- 80-90 Mem No: 3874
- Location: 3874 Leighton Buzzard
Re: 1600ct to 1641
Its a standard 2.0 bottom end with bigger barrels and piston, a fast cam and adjustable tappets rather than hydraulic.
Top end is slightly better, acceleration is much better and generally more torquey. I dont have to down shift going uphill anymore
Top end is slightly better, acceleration is much better and generally more torquey. I dont have to down shift going uphill anymore

-
- Registered user
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 16:27
- 80-90 Mem No: 6478
- Location: Bloomington, Indiana USA
Re: 1600ct to 1641
Did you do this work yourself or is there a performance shop over there doing this? I didn't think the Air-cooled could handle being much bigger than 2L.
- Gunslinger
- Registered user
- Posts: 1426
- Joined: 16 Jul 2007, 14:14
- 80-90 Mem No: 3874
- Location: 3874 Leighton Buzzard
Re: 1600ct to 1641
reluctantartist wrote:Did you do this work yourself or is there a performance shop over there doing this? I didn't think the Air-cooled could handle being much bigger than 2L.
It was done by a company in Erith, Kent called The Engine Shop
- Vanagonman
- Registered user
- Posts: 165
- Joined: 30 Aug 2006, 05:52
Re: 1600ct to 1641
reluctantartist wrote:I take that is 20-24 using imperial gallons. That isn't much different than the 2L. I thought it might be slightly better![]()
Thanks
That's because we're running carbs and perhaps your 2 liter type 4 is running fool injection?
Over here in Europe almost all 2.0 Type 4s are dual carbed from the factory.
was....82 Westy, 80 Mk. 3 Transporter, 69 Bay
now....66 T1 LHD 1.6 Bus
* If you need it to arrive safe & in one piece..*

now....66 T1 LHD 1.6 Bus
* If you need it to arrive safe & in one piece..*
