Anti roll bar, remove or keep ?

Syncro 4&4 Discussion and Q&A last answered over 2 years ago.
You may also want to visit the Wiki(pedia) for a more structured index of T25 repair, maintenance, technical and ownership topics (browse for Syncro links)

You can find further syncro specific information on the Syncronauts website.

Moderators: User administrators, Moderators

Cate
Registered user
Posts: 2065
Joined: 10 Oct 2005, 12:43
80-90 Mem No: 1024
Location: Here & there on the Isle of Wight. 80-90 1024, sync 22, Goon.

Post by Cate »

Thought you said it was better wth them fitted?
Me!
..and here's the twist...I don't exist....

User avatar
matt
Registered user
Posts: 7761
Joined: 09 Oct 2005, 18:37
80-90 Mem No: 397
Location: #Derbados

Post by matt »

i just said it was fine.......of course its better with them fitted, or why else would they be there :?
:)

User avatar
HarryMann
Admin/Mod
Posts: 9610
Joined: 30 Sep 2005, 11:40
80-90 Mem No: 379
Location: Herts, UK

Post by HarryMann »

Sorry to drag this back up, but just wondering if anyone has experimented without it since? I will be seeing what mines like without it on road for a few days (not out of choice unfortunately )

Don't apologise, its good to even know they're there, and not flly answered - let us know what you find.

This is a handling and roadholding issue on tarmac, and handling is generally considered worse when a vehicle rolls a lot and sometimes immediacy is lost. But roadholding itself might be OK, or better, as increasing roll-stiffness (roll-bar at the front) tends to increase understeer, and whilst a stabilising influence, is also one that increases slip-angle, like stiffening the front shocks. The vehicle drifts out and requires more steering lock. Without it, this should be less so.

So the warning signs to watch for are the opposite, a tightening once established in the curve and ultimately, oversteer that becomes excessive or just plain boorish to deal with all the time e.g. sawing at the wheel to maintain smooth cornering.
Reaction to road surface condition might be a bit more dramatic too.

See what you think!

The 80-90 Tech Wikipedia Your 1st port of call :idea

Syncro Kastenwagen / 16" Kombi Camper
Syncronaut No. 1

User avatar
Boltze
Registered user
Posts: 85
Joined: 10 Jan 2006, 13:51
80-90 Mem No: 2510
Location: Fuerth - Germany - Syncronaut 64
Contact:

Post by Boltze »

Hi,

I removed both for a time, because they broke. I've fixed them. I think its better to have them mounted. I realised the are better for side winds by driving.
You can drive without the stabilizer, but its better to have it mounted.

missusjen
Registered user
Posts: 1522
Joined: 09 Oct 2005, 18:54
80-90 Mem No: 0
Location: a million miles from here, somewhere more familar
Contact:

Post by missusjen »

I've not had one on since the MOT pass back in January - never really drove the Syncro much with it on tbh, only to work and stuff. It handles fairly much like the 2wd camper with pop top I reckon, and I've not rolled it yet (touches wood/rabbits foot/4 leaved clover). I'll get it back on after Coney/first wage packet - needs new bushes, and I'll also start using road tyres for a change - then I'll maybe be able to give you a better comment.....
Image

"HEY, LOOK AT MY CAR"


I bid you farewell.......for now.......

Diamond Hell
Registered user
Posts: 961
Joined: 09 Oct 2005, 17:27
80-90 Mem No: 830

Post by Diamond Hell »

For offd-road work the bus should be better minus the anti-roll bar as it will allow the front suspension to move more independently and keep in contact with the ground more.

On road it will make the front more supple, so yes, it may be more sensitive to side winds.

Not tried it on my buses, but certainly by stiffening up the rear of the Golf SYncro by fitting a Golf Rallye anti roll bar I know you change the handling of the car from determined understeer to nice neutrality and then oversteer. :twisted: Suits me.
Diamond Hell
Still Syncro, just much fasterer

Locked