airhead wrote:FM doesnt have a very high dynamic range. Its only 60dBs, so thats why you lose out on sound quality. The input into the transmitter has to be compressed. That and youre dealing with MP3s in the first place and youre really losign a lot of quality. Processing systems for FM radio stations to control the dynamic range are very advanced pieces of equipment. If youre interested, look up the Orban Optimod or Digimod on google.
Aye - I hear what you say re FM compression ( though I don't think these FM thingies have a compressor built in - just a soft AGC ) and MP3 quality in general, but the quality I was referring to was that of the actual FM transmitters we are talking about.
They are built so cheaply that the audio, modulation and RF stages are all really poor performance. Plus the output frequency is unstable and jitters around with power supply modulation and even mechanical vibrations. They are not even PLL put usually just crystal controlled oscillators !!
Re MP3's - I agree that even 192 bitrate is low on Hi-Fi quality, but the compression and lack of dynamic range can be a good advantage in a relatively noisy environment such as a camper van ( or noisy party !! )
For now I recommend the hard wired option for simplicity, cheapness, quality, no extra batteries and reliability.
beep beep beep - my two pence worth has just run out.
anyway, just thought, all this techy stuff should be in a different thread - sorry for the Hi-Jack
