Definitely a loss of valve lift there then OBG ?
Now onto the crankshaft.
I'm a bit confused about this engine, at least with my current state of knowledge.
The cases are late cases I believe. Tonight I have discovered that there are 3 WBX 1.9 crankshafts, early, late blue code, late red code, the colours denoting the bearing size.
As I understand things the early crank has a wider "all in one" number 1 thrust bearing, while the later models have a narrower bearing with two thrust washers. As I cannot see any paint marks on my crank I assume I have an early crankshaft with the wider thrust washer. So why is it in a late case ??
So, onto the crankshaft assessment. Conrods numbered, matching rod numbers all on the underside. Didn't have a puller to remove the gear so that'll happen later
Number 1 bearing seems to have some tapering at the flywheel end, I have not decided if that is wear, or as designed as the journal may not be in contact with the bearing at that point
Now cylinder 4 big end journal, can you see those three or four little marks on the left hand side, I'll need to take a closer look at those, not rough though.
and the corresponding rod, some wear on the rod bearing
Next up the crank, number 2
Number 3 looks very good
Number 1 showing clear signs of wobble on the rod. I measured the side to side play using a dial gauge on each of the rods at the small end before removing. Number 1 was the worst at 1.36mm, others were in the range 1.0-1.1mm. I believe the spec is 0.7mm
One nearly naked crank. I measured each of the the journals. Each of them was just 0.01mm below nominal dimension (so a nominal 60mm journal measured 59.99mm) which is as new for a "blue" or early crank, except for number 4 which was 0.03mm below nominal when the wear limit is 0.016. I'll need to recheck that measurement.
So my initial conclusion on the crank, subject to reviewing a couple of points, is that it is in very good condition with virtually no wear. I have not checked the little ends or gudgeon pins yet, perhaps that will give some clue as to the cause of the wear on number 1 big ends bearing.
I measured the shims, 0.35, 0.34 and 0.26mm, didn't see if the sizes were still visible on the shims themselves
Taking account of what I know so far, perhaps the reason why this engine has been put in the recycling basket was not for any major failure, but simply for low oil pressure, caused by general bearing wear, even though some of them do look very good. That does seem contrary to this being a VW rebuild engine, which I assume would have been done "right" but I suppose even these could be 20+ years old now and who knows what mileage.
Next step is I think is to reassemble rods and measure bearing dimensions. I haven't checked yet, but I bet the rods have stretch bolts in
Further thoughts / comments welcomed