air or water

Big lumps of metals and spanners.

Moderators: User administrators, Moderators

mack
Registered user
Posts: 13
Joined: 03 Aug 2013, 12:39
80-90 Mem No: 13686
Location: west mids

air or water

Post by mack »

hi guys
i'm a noob to the forum (doesn't seem to be an "introduce yourself" section )-so hi all

hope this is in the right place.

just wanting to know peoples views on the old air cooled or water cooled debate :?:

I know a few pro's and cons of both,but is the Aircooled lump ,o.k on long journeys ? every motorcycle iv'e ever had has been air/oil cooled & never had a problem with any-are the ol vw air cooled lumps the same
cheers guys

User avatar
Oldiebut goodie
Registered user
Posts: 7484
Joined: 18 Apr 2008, 01:19
80-90 Mem No: 11135
Location: Eastern Angle

Re: air or water

Post by Oldiebut goodie »

Put several thousand miles on a new bay in the 70s in a month - no problems whatsoever.
Now diesel with no problems.
All depends upon your maintenance same as any machine.
1.6D 2019 VW T-Cross
200hp VW T6
1̶Y̶ ̶1̶9̶8̶7̶ ̶H̶i̶-̶t̶o̶p̶ ̶C̶a̶r̶a̶v̶e̶l̶l̶e̶
5̶0̶8̶d̶ ̶M̶e̶r̶c̶

faggie
Registered user
Posts: 1025
Joined: 10 Jan 2010, 17:10

Re: air or water

Post by faggie »

i have both and i would pick Aircooled every time less hassle more tunable easier to fix

User avatar
ghost123uk
Registered user
Posts: 6855
Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 10:15
80-90 Mem No: 2585
Location: John in Malpas, in the very S. W. part of Cheshire.
Contact:

Re: air or water

Post by ghost123uk »

Hi and welcome to here :ok

I have never owned an Aircooled but from 12 years of using a water cooled and reading this forum, I know =

1600 Aircooled = very under powered (actually I did own one of these, for a week, many years ago, it was slow and blew up in spectacular fashion :shock: I sold it "as is")

2Ltr Aircooled = a lot of folks like them, reasonable power, can be tuned, a bit thirsty but better if LPG'd ;)

Early 1.9 water cooled (DF) = OK but a bit under powered and prone to expensive problems related to the water jacket to head seals, often resulting in a replacement motor being needed ( ~£1000 )

Later 1.9 water cooled (DG) = (what I have in 2 x vans) = OK all round but also prone to expensive problems related to the water jacket to head seals, often resulting in a replacement motor being needed ( ~£1000 )

2.1 Water cooled, plenty of power, sometimes equipped with fuel injection, which is usually reliable but if it does give problems, there is a lot more to "know about" to fix it. Also prone to throwing con rods if poorly maintained or over revved, plus the usual expensive problems related to the water jacket to head seals, often resulting in a replacement motor being needed ( ~£1000+ ).

Many owners (including me) have an LPG conversion fitted with cuts fuel bills by about 1/3rd (or ~33% for you modern kids :lol: )

Hope that helps.
Got a new van, but it's a 165bhp T4 [shock horror] Accurate LPG Station map here

mack
Registered user
Posts: 13
Joined: 03 Aug 2013, 12:39
80-90 Mem No: 13686
Location: west mids

Re: air or water

Post by mack »

thanks for the replies guys :ok

certainly has given me some more to think about

User avatar
ed_the_robot
Registered user
Posts: 64
Joined: 13 Apr 2012, 21:08
80-90 Mem No: 11937
Location: Nottingham

Re: air or water

Post by ed_the_robot »

We own a 1600 air cooled camper, or as some would say we put up with owning!

It is true that it has a 65 or so mph top speed, slow acceleration... But...

Keep one tuned up, in good clean condition and they are bomb proof. Vw designed it as a lower cost option, with low compression so it's less stressed, though less powerful, even less bhp than a late bay 1600.

Plus they sound great ;)

Just sayin' :p
Owner of Doris, the Aircooled CT Campervan and Liberty Belle the 1.6 "GTD" Single Cab

Tobyt25
Registered user
Posts: 636
Joined: 01 Jul 2013, 20:59
80-90 Mem No: 0

Re: air or water

Post by Tobyt25 »

Its all about the sound on an air cooled.

User avatar
monkeyboysee
Registered user
Posts: 657
Joined: 03 May 2012, 17:55
80-90 Mem No: 11025
Location: Misterton

Re: air or water

Post by monkeyboysee »

Tobyt25 wrote:Its all about the sound on an air cooled.

I second that!
1989 1.9d Tintop ongoing
"I don't have to sell my soul, he's already in me!" Ian Brown

faggie
Registered user
Posts: 1025
Joined: 10 Jan 2010, 17:10

Re: air or water

Post by faggie »

mines sounds better than any soundtrack especially with its performance exhaust

Tobyt25
Registered user
Posts: 636
Joined: 01 Jul 2013, 20:59
80-90 Mem No: 0

Re: air or water

Post by Tobyt25 »

faggie wrote:mines sounds better than any soundtrack especially with its performance exhaust

How much was your exhaust and what does it look like??

faggie
Registered user
Posts: 1025
Joined: 10 Jan 2010, 17:10

Re: air or water

Post by faggie »

now the bad news it was nearly the price you have been quoted for a new engine

User avatar
CovKid
Trader
Posts: 8411
Joined: 30 Apr 2006, 13:19
80-90 Mem No: 3529
Location: Ralph - Coventry (Retired)
Contact:

Re: air or water

Post by CovKid »

Air or water - thought the question was going to be "What should I fill my tyres with" or which is best for hiccups. :D

Don't think 'dabate' is right word as they're different beasts entirely, besides this has been asked before.

I like them both - they each have their strengths and weaknesses but essentially an Aircooled is a Beetle engine maxed out, simpler and less to go wrong in many ways but more expensive on parts I found. Some bits are obsolete, but still good old workhorses.
Roller paint your camper at home: http://roller.epizy.com/55554/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; for MP4 download.

Tobyt25
Registered user
Posts: 636
Joined: 01 Jul 2013, 20:59
80-90 Mem No: 0

Re: air or water

Post by Tobyt25 »

Personally i say buy a van with good bodywork, then look at the interior and it doesn't matter if its air or water cooled. If your undecided, you will love either.

faggie
Registered user
Posts: 1025
Joined: 10 Jan 2010, 17:10

Re: air or water

Post by faggie »

the Aircooled vans never seem to rust on the front panel anywhere near as bad as the watercooled vans

mark
Registered user
Posts: 1248
Joined: 05 Jun 2011, 11:06
80-90 Mem No: 9768
Location: hull. f*** me the city of culture

Re: air or water

Post by mark »

I'm prepared to be shot down over this, I'm thinking that its partly down to the mdf panels used to direct the air at the rad
mark
faggie wrote:the Aircooled vans never seem to rust on the front panel anywhere near as bad as the watercooled vans
1988 1.9 dg Caravel.
https://i.imgur.com/oIt3VLk.jpg

Locked