BLIMEY! ARB carnage

Syncro 4&4 Discussion and Q&A last answered over 2 years ago.
You may also want to visit the Wiki(pedia) for a more structured index of T25 repair, maintenance, technical and ownership topics (browse for Syncro links)

You can find further syncro specific information on the Syncronauts website.

Moderators: User administrators, Moderators

v-lux
Trader
Posts: 737
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 18:54
80-90 Mem No: 2951
Location: Somerset....yarp!
Contact:

Re: BLIMEY! ARB carnage

Post by v-lux »

Food for thought....

Image

max and caddy
Registered user
Posts: 1931
Joined: 21 Feb 2012, 21:47
80-90 Mem No: 0
Location: lancaster uk

Re: BLIMEY! ARB carnage

Post by max and caddy »

I could make that...no maybe not... what's that bar off.. Looks very familiar.

silverbullet
Trader
Posts: 17229
Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 09:51
80-90 Mem No: 6908
Location: Surrey Syncronaut #156
Contact:

Re: BLIMEY! ARB carnage

Post by silverbullet »

Little bit of layman's applied maths/practical physics, brace yourselves...

ARB's generally work best with the links working at 90 degrees, viewed in side elevation i.e at kerb weight, moderately loaded. Small variations due to load (at the front of the vehicle) don't make a big change to the working angles, so the effective leverage (or apparent stiffness of the bar) stays much the same.

So far so good.

But this only truly applies if the links are also working at 90 deg. when viewed in plan. If the ARB's arms splay out and a vehicle is lowered or raised beyond the manufacturers design limits, the geometry start to go awry. The links may also be working at compound angles and also subjecting the working lever end of the ARB to torsional forces as well as leverage (there is a transition from torsion to bending throughout the bends at each end)

Now as the angle of droop increases (pos. or neg.) the effective lever arm length starts to become shortened, making the bar seem stiffer than it really is (think what it would be like if the bar ends were hanging straight down: Lever arm length = zero, with the bar only subject to bending of the unsupported ends, from link to clamp. Stiff as hell, but no torsion at all!)

This is how adjustable ARB's work, they have rotating "blade" ends that vary in stiffness from horizontal (full soft) to vertical (full stiff)

Suspension forces are massive and are quite capable of bending the apparently unbendable. Any rubber components will get deformed quite dramatically but since rubber is inherently rising-rate (more force for a given deflection) it can also transmit a lot more force. That's why Polybushes are great for some racing applications i.e. where a small amount of deflection is desirable/tolerable i.e. to improve component life and give a degree of occupant comfort.

Then again, it could just be metal fatigue or a manufacturing fault in an end-of-run component. Quality control does tend to fall off at the end of a production run, so that might be a contributing factor too :wink:
1985 Oettinger 3.2 Caravelle RHD syncro twin slider. SA Microbus bumpers, duplex winch system, ARC 7X15 period alloys

User avatar
jebiga41
Trader
Posts: 758
Joined: 15 Mar 2008, 15:50
80-90 Mem No: 5654
Location: dublin ireland
Contact:

Re: BLIMEY! ARB carnage

Post by jebiga41 »

v-lux wrote:Food for thought....

Image
was it the pink bushes that cauht your eye Al ? Ye big gayer :lol: :lol:
VW T3/T25 and Syncro Gearbox rebuilds
http://vantopia.ie

silverbullet
Trader
Posts: 17229
Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 09:51
80-90 Mem No: 6908
Location: Surrey Syncronaut #156
Contact:

Re: BLIMEY! ARB carnage

Post by silverbullet »

Red and blue! How patriotic...

Something else occurred to me that might be a contributing factor to the ARB failure:

Halfshafts that have been used on one side of a vehicle (and this applies to torsion bars too) do NOT like being subject to reversed stresses. They often fail soon after fitting to the opposite side, loss of drive not being uncommon just after reversing out of a parking space.

Could it be that ARB's that have been conditioned to being stressed at particular angles (i.e. standard ride height) could fail due to the increased/different forces being put upon them as a result of a lift?

Lowered vans probably don't suffer this failure since they are so much stiffer sprung and have far less suspension travel.
1985 Oettinger 3.2 Caravelle RHD syncro twin slider. SA Microbus bumpers, duplex winch system, ARC 7X15 period alloys

v-lux
Trader
Posts: 737
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 18:54
80-90 Mem No: 2951
Location: Somerset....yarp!
Contact:

Re: BLIMEY! ARB carnage

Post by v-lux »

I do like pink..... :wink:

User avatar
lloydy
Registered user
Posts: 8015
Joined: 24 Nov 2009, 17:54
80-90 Mem No: 5262
Location: cheam surrey

Re: BLIMEY! ARB carnage

Post by lloydy »

better than brown
Time is a drug. Too much of it kills you

max and caddy
Registered user
Posts: 1931
Joined: 21 Feb 2012, 21:47
80-90 Mem No: 0
Location: lancaster uk

Re: BLIMEY! ARB carnage

Post by max and caddy »

I like a bit of both myself...

User avatar
syncropaddy
Registered user
Posts: 887
Joined: 17 Oct 2005, 22:46
80-90 Mem No: 1019
Location: Gorey, Co. Wexford, Ireland

Re: BLIMEY! ARB carnage

Post by syncropaddy »

max and caddy wrote:I like a bit of both myself...

Same here but they must be very close!

Ian, have you a degree in the bleedin obvious?
syncropaddy


One Syncro, five Mercedes Benzs and a rocket ship

silverbullet
Trader
Posts: 17229
Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 09:51
80-90 Mem No: 6908
Location: Surrey Syncronaut #156
Contact:

Re: BLIMEY! ARB carnage

Post by silverbullet »

syncropaddy wrote:
Ian, have you a degree in the bleedin obvious?

No, but not everyone has had the benefit of a classical education, old chap. It's good to share :wink:
1985 Oettinger 3.2 Caravelle RHD syncro twin slider. SA Microbus bumpers, duplex winch system, ARC 7X15 period alloys

Locked