VEHICLE LEVEL/SUSPENSION SPRINGS

Big lumps of metals and spanners.

Moderators: User administrators, Moderators

Locked
Jeff J
Registered user
Posts: 648
Joined: 02 Jul 2012, 07:12
80-90 Mem No: 13853
Location: Millom Cumbria

VEHICLE LEVEL/SUSPENSION SPRINGS

Post by Jeff J »

I thought I'd post this in case anyone else had the same problem. Since buying my 1985 Autosleeper high top I have noticed that it was not level front to back. The seller told me it had new springs fitted in it's recent history but was not sure which ones (husband's got dementia sadly).
I asked on here for help with dimensions for heights etc & was finally able to establish that from the centre of the hub to the bottom of the wheel arch should be 17 inches give or take,( mine was 17F & 15R) , which made it that my rear springs were low.
I'm assuming that the fronts were new & rears were originals because with new springs fitted to the rear the problem is solved.
The thing I found interesting when I took the old ones off & could not see when in-situ was that the thickness of the first 2 coils top & bottom were 10mm dia & the spring then tapered out to 17mm dia. The new springs were the same diameter for their entire length as were the front ones. Presumably this is why the back end sagged as the thinner parts of the coils aged & weakened.
Just got to sort the carb now (think the choke flap is sticking) then get it taxed for the 1st May & the fun bit should start

User avatar
kevtherev
Registered user
Posts: 18832
Joined: 23 Oct 2005, 20:13
80-90 Mem No: 2264
Location: Country estate Wolverhampton Actually

Re: VEHICLE LEVEL/SUSPENSION SPRINGS

Post by kevtherev »

Actually the thinner "pig tails" on the end of the springs are correct.
AGG 2.0L 8V. (Golf GTi MkIII)

Jeff J
Registered user
Posts: 648
Joined: 02 Jul 2012, 07:12
80-90 Mem No: 13853
Location: Millom Cumbria

Re: VEHICLE LEVEL/SUSPENSION SPRINGS

Post by Jeff J »

So would the original front ones have been like that as well? The pig tails, as you call them, effectively shortened the springs by 2 inches.

User avatar
AdrianC
Registered user
Posts: 2975
Joined: 29 Dec 2010, 21:57
80-90 Mem No: 9144
Location: Living in Hay whilst the Sun pours down.
Contact:

Re: VEHICLE LEVEL/SUSPENSION SPRINGS

Post by AdrianC »

Jeff J wrote:So would the original front ones have been like that as well? The pig tails, as you call them, effectively shortened the springs by 2 inches.

The pigtails are part of the design of the spring. We're talking about a commercial vehicle designed to be used heavily loaded as well as empty, and with a relatively high difference between those two states.

ALL springs age and weaken - and it affects the whole length of the spring, not just the pigtails. Don't forget - the average life expectancy of a new vehicle is less than a decade. They aren't designed or intended to last a quarter of a century. Replacing some things over time, because they're just plain too old and knackered, is to be expected.
A year and a half living in a Westy hightop... http://www.WhereverTheRoadGoes.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Locked