This should do it...a new technical discussion!

Syncro 4&4 Discussion and Q&A last answered over 2 years ago.
You may also want to visit the Wiki(pedia) for a more structured index of T25 repair, maintenance, technical and ownership topics (browse for Syncro links)

You can find further syncro specific information on the Syncronauts website.

Moderators: User administrators, Moderators

KarlT
Registered user
Posts: 2958
Joined: 28 Nov 2005, 21:39
80-90 Mem No: 2266
Location: location, location.---Sunny South Devon
Contact:

Re: This should do it...a new technical discussion!

Post by KarlT »

:rofl I wonder if there are Audi A4 forums with people stating that there isn't room for a bed, fridge & sink to be fitted in the back? :idea :rofl

User avatar
syncropaddy
Registered user
Posts: 887
Joined: 17 Oct 2005, 22:46
80-90 Mem No: 1019
Location: Gorey, Co. Wexford, Ireland

Re: This should do it...a new technical discussion!

Post by syncropaddy »

KarlT wrote::rofl I wonder if there are Audi A4 forums with people stating that there isn't room for a bed, fridge & sink to be fitted in the back? :idea :rofl

You never know but the interweb is a strange place .......... and the boot in an A4 is rubbish!

Anyway everything is relative
syncropaddy


One Syncro, five Mercedes Benzs and a rocket ship

silverbullet
Trader
Posts: 17229
Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 09:51
80-90 Mem No: 6908
Location: Surrey Syncronaut #156
Contact:

Re: This should do it...a new technical discussion!

Post by silverbullet »

My 2002 Allroad had a decent boot and at least the rear seats folded properly flat (not long enough to kip in though)

Good handling car though, but hefty at 2000kg. Only 25k from tyres at best on special Pirellis, £150 a corner...

Variable height air suspension, double wishbones all round...

I think that GW "guessed" that the COG axis of a syncro Westy was just about behind the front grille badge, based on their forklift tilt "test". Now that's quite a way off the ground.

Now if someone's got a set of corner weight scales (ideally) or even a c.w. lift gauge to work wheel-to-wheel, then COG could be worked out fairly closely; even if only to advise owners of the safe side slope angle before pushing their luck when off-road, conditions permitting.

It's a public service you know :wink:
1985 Oettinger 3.2 Caravelle RHD syncro twin slider. SA Microbus bumpers, duplex winch system, ARC 7X15 period alloys

User avatar
HarryMann
Admin/Mod
Posts: 9610
Joined: 30 Sep 2005, 11:40
80-90 Mem No: 379
Location: Herts, UK

Re: This should do it...a new technical discussion!

Post by HarryMann »

40 degrees isn't it... haven't you seen the original syncro PR video

The 80-90 Tech Wikipedia Your 1st port of call :idea

1.9TD Syncro Doka / Syncro Kastenwagen / 16" Kombi Camper
Syncronaut No. 1

silverbullet
Trader
Posts: 17229
Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 09:51
80-90 Mem No: 6908
Location: Surrey Syncronaut #156
Contact:

Re: This should do it...a new technical discussion!

Post by silverbullet »

What ho Clive! 40 degrees "safe" or "on the limit under optimal conditions"? Panel van or full-loaded Westy?

Now if an enterprising individual had a couple of 3m lengths of 250mm channel, a see-saw could be knocked up for next to nothing to find the fore-aft balance point of individual vehicles...

But that doesn't get anyone any nearer to actually knowing if a suspension lift does actually improve or diminish a syncro's handling, considering the attendant increase in spring rates, changes to anti-roll bar effective lever lengths (if fitted) etc

Anecdotal evidence is all well and good, but I'd like to see some supporting figures before I went a-lifting.

My little donkey is so light on it's feet anyway it doesn't need it :mrgreen:
1985 Oettinger 3.2 Caravelle RHD syncro twin slider. SA Microbus bumpers, duplex winch system, ARC 7X15 period alloys

KarlT
Registered user
Posts: 2958
Joined: 28 Nov 2005, 21:39
80-90 Mem No: 2266
Location: location, location.---Sunny South Devon
Contact:

Re: This should do it...a new technical discussion!

Post by KarlT »

toomanytoys wrote::roll:


Why the removal TMT? You didn't come acrss as too daft! :lol:

silverbullet
Trader
Posts: 17229
Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 09:51
80-90 Mem No: 6908
Location: Surrey Syncronaut #156
Contact:

Re: This should do it...a new technical discussion!

Post by silverbullet »

Hee hee! I knew this topic would get people going! What did Si post up then Karl?
1985 Oettinger 3.2 Caravelle RHD syncro twin slider. SA Microbus bumpers, duplex winch system, ARC 7X15 period alloys

User avatar
hugomonkey
Registered user
Posts: 1033
Joined: 26 Apr 2011, 05:29
80-90 Mem No: 10485
Location: Denmark

Re: This should do it...a new technical discussion!

Post by hugomonkey »

ask this guy at 37 seconds in about the 40 degrees
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsmrRR7moKk&feature=fvsr" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Regards Jason
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHp3lQKS6lo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

silverbullet
Trader
Posts: 17229
Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 09:51
80-90 Mem No: 6908
Location: Surrey Syncronaut #156
Contact:

Re: This should do it...a new technical discussion!

Post by silverbullet »

Ouch. Well he was attacking the hill like a right one.... looks like they had trouble getting the windscreen back in, not very straight after that.
1985 Oettinger 3.2 Caravelle RHD syncro twin slider. SA Microbus bumpers, duplex winch system, ARC 7X15 period alloys

User avatar
T'Onion
Moderator
Posts: 10812
Joined: 07 Oct 2005, 17:39
80-90 Mem No: 255
Location: Sheffield or 07737167005

Re: This should do it...a new technical discussion!

Post by T'Onion »

hugomonkey wrote:ask this guy at 37 seconds in about the 40 degrees
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsmrRR7moKk&feature=fvsr" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;



:ok
victus in mutuo vicis
Ego mori tu mori

User avatar
hugomonkey
Registered user
Posts: 1033
Joined: 26 Apr 2011, 05:29
80-90 Mem No: 10485
Location: Denmark

Re: This should do it...a new technical discussion!

Post by hugomonkey »

silverbullet wrote:Ouch. Well he was attacking the hill like a right one.... looks like they had trouble getting the windscreen back in, not very straight after that.
if you watch all the films parts 1-5 it certainly shows you what a beating these vans can take!!!
looking forward to trying a bit myself!! :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
Regards Jason
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHp3lQKS6lo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

silverbullet
Trader
Posts: 17229
Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 09:51
80-90 Mem No: 6908
Location: Surrey Syncronaut #156
Contact:

Re: This should do it...a new technical discussion!

Post by silverbullet »

So I suppose no-one really wants to (or can't) answer the original question then:

What are the effects on the relationship between roll centre and COG and the handling implications resulting from a suspension lift on a T3 syncro?

With relevant numbers, graphs, drawings and data please :mrgreen:
1985 Oettinger 3.2 Caravelle RHD syncro twin slider. SA Microbus bumpers, duplex winch system, ARC 7X15 period alloys

User avatar
HarryMann
Admin/Mod
Posts: 9610
Joined: 30 Sep 2005, 11:40
80-90 Mem No: 379
Location: Herts, UK

Re: This should do it...a new technical discussion!

Post by HarryMann »

ask this guy at 37 seconds in about the 40 degrees

If you watch closely - he had the wheel fairly hard over to the left most of the critical time... a straight ahead or bit of right lock when it started jumping up like that, would have easily prevented that rollover. You don't steer against an incipient roll, but into it...

But, I'd better button by bouche, before it bappens to be :)

The 80-90 Tech Wikipedia Your 1st port of call :idea

1.9TD Syncro Doka / Syncro Kastenwagen / 16" Kombi Camper
Syncronaut No. 1

KarlT
Registered user
Posts: 2958
Joined: 28 Nov 2005, 21:39
80-90 Mem No: 2266
Location: location, location.---Sunny South Devon
Contact:

Re: This should do it...a new technical discussion!

Post by KarlT »

silverbullet wrote:So I suppose no-one really wants to (or can't) answer the original question then:

What are the effects on the relationship between roll centre and COG and the handling implications resulting from a suspension lift on a T3 syncro?

With relevant numbers, graphs, drawings and data please :mrgreen:


Well, you're right. I can't. but I guess you'd have to specify the perimeters. The options are almost infinite... Type of springs, shocks, type of wheels, type of tyre, body type, camper conversion....etc etc.
I guess you would have to ask a more precise question, with relevant numbers, graphs, drawings and data. :rollin

User avatar
hugomonkey
Registered user
Posts: 1033
Joined: 26 Apr 2011, 05:29
80-90 Mem No: 10485
Location: Denmark

Re: This should do it...a new technical discussion!

Post by hugomonkey »

silverbullet wrote:So I suppose no-one really wants to (or can't) answer the original question then:

What are the effects on the relationship between roll centre and COG and the handling implications resulting from a suspension lift on a T3 syncro?

With relevant numbers, graphs, drawings and data please :mrgreen:
It´s not that we don´t want to talk about it we´re just all in denial :run
Regards Jason
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHp3lQKS6lo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Locked