Just wondered if all you brain boxes out there can tell me how easy it is to swap from drum brakes to disc breaks and an idea of what's required to do this.
Cheers.
Brake conversions
Moderators: User administrators, Moderators
-
- Registered user
- Posts: 172
- Joined: 24 Feb 2012, 22:36
- 80-90 Mem No: 10742
- Location: Plymouth
- Contact:
Brake conversions
Dave.
1986 watercooled 1.9DG
1986 watercooled 1.9DG
- Ian Hulley
- Registered user
- Posts: 12661
- Joined: 11 Oct 2005, 08:08
- 80-90 Mem No: 1323
- Location: Wirksworth, Derbyshire ... or at t'mill
Re: Brake conversions
I believe Futbus do these kits.
Yep, here ya go ... http://www.futbus.com/Brake-conversion- ... e-Kit.html
Ian
Yep, here ya go ... http://www.futbus.com/Brake-conversion- ... e-Kit.html
Ian
The Hulley's Bus
1989 2.1DJ Trampspotter
LPG courtesy of Steve @ Gasure
1989 2.1DJ Trampspotter
LPG courtesy of Steve @ Gasure
-
- Registered user
- Posts: 160
- Joined: 12 Apr 2008, 16:29
- 80-90 Mem No: 0
- Location: Bridgend, Wales
Re: Brake conversions
I believe Ultimate Engineering and Holman Engineering (silverbullet on here) also do rear disc kits. I think they are based on Sharan/Galaxy set ups
Dave
Dave
- axeman
- Registered user
- Posts: 1249
- Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 19:50
- 80-90 Mem No: 6410
- Location: Smeeth kent country side
Re: Brake conversions
scroll down this page to have a look at ian's work.
https://club8090.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.p ... 5&start=75" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
neil
https://club8090.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.p ... 5&start=75" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
neil
Back in the game with an uncut 2wd panel van
-
- Registered user
- Posts: 2673
- Joined: 03 Apr 2007, 12:54
- 80-90 Mem No: 8386
- Location: Nottingham
Re: Brake conversions
Probably been said before but:
Braking systems roughly work on an approximate 60 : 40 split front to rear (fronts doing 60% of the work, rears only 40%)
This is because weight moves to the front wheels when braking whilst the weight on the rear wheels reduces)
Fact: If you increase the rear braking efficiency you effectively upset that balance which can result in dangerous rear wheel locking under only moderate braking.
So to maintain the necessary 'balance' any rear disc setup will offer little improvement in braking efficiency.
So why the heck would anyone spend that kind of money for no apparent gain? the simple answer to this is heat disipation.
The 'open' design of a disc/caliper arrangement over drum and shoes means that under sustained and heavy braking disc brakes are much less likely to suffer from brake fade.
Another fact that many will not know: drum brakes with their leading and trailing shoes have a 'self servo action' where the leading edge of the brake shoe effectively pulls it'self into the drum in a 'wedging action' .... brake pads on disc's do not have this beneficial action.
My advice to anyone wishing to improve their brakes is to look at the front brakes first..they do most of the work so improving the fronts will bring the most gains whilst avoiding that dangerous imbalance (rears being too powerful proportionally compared to the fronts).
I'm betting all the good modders out there who have gone to the time and expense of manufacturing rear disc setups did so after modding their front brakes first.
Martin
Braking systems roughly work on an approximate 60 : 40 split front to rear (fronts doing 60% of the work, rears only 40%)
This is because weight moves to the front wheels when braking whilst the weight on the rear wheels reduces)
Fact: If you increase the rear braking efficiency you effectively upset that balance which can result in dangerous rear wheel locking under only moderate braking.
So to maintain the necessary 'balance' any rear disc setup will offer little improvement in braking efficiency.
So why the heck would anyone spend that kind of money for no apparent gain? the simple answer to this is heat disipation.
The 'open' design of a disc/caliper arrangement over drum and shoes means that under sustained and heavy braking disc brakes are much less likely to suffer from brake fade.
Another fact that many will not know: drum brakes with their leading and trailing shoes have a 'self servo action' where the leading edge of the brake shoe effectively pulls it'self into the drum in a 'wedging action' .... brake pads on disc's do not have this beneficial action.
My advice to anyone wishing to improve their brakes is to look at the front brakes first..they do most of the work so improving the fronts will bring the most gains whilst avoiding that dangerous imbalance (rears being too powerful proportionally compared to the fronts).
I'm betting all the good modders out there who have gone to the time and expense of manufacturing rear disc setups did so after modding their front brakes first.
Martin
Last edited by California Dreamin on 03 Mar 2012, 22:25, edited 1 time in total.
1989 California 2.1MV
- toomanytoys
- Trader
- Posts: 2872
- Joined: 11 Oct 2005, 18:37
- 80-90 Mem No: 41
- Location: Boston area, South Lincolnshire
Re: Brake conversions
^^^WHS^^^
Std brakes in good condition with quality pads and shoes and serviced properly are very good.. of course.. most people are very spoilt these days with over assisted modern cars.. remember you are stopping a 2 ton + vehicle.. press a little harder
Of course if you have installed a much more powerful engine etc, then rear discs could be a nice addition.. but you really want to be upgrading the fronts too..
In South Africa VW only upgraded the front brakes even on the 2.6 I5 140 bhp vans and thats in a much higher ambient air temperature...
There are advantages for offroading in that they perform better in wet and muddy conditions and easier to clean out...
Std brakes in good condition with quality pads and shoes and serviced properly are very good.. of course.. most people are very spoilt these days with over assisted modern cars.. remember you are stopping a 2 ton + vehicle.. press a little harder

Of course if you have installed a much more powerful engine etc, then rear discs could be a nice addition.. but you really want to be upgrading the fronts too..
In South Africa VW only upgraded the front brakes even on the 2.6 I5 140 bhp vans and thats in a much higher ambient air temperature...
There are advantages for offroading in that they perform better in wet and muddy conditions and easier to clean out...
- Ian Hulley
- Registered user
- Posts: 12661
- Joined: 11 Oct 2005, 08:08
- 80-90 Mem No: 1323
- Location: Wirksworth, Derbyshire ... or at t'mill
Re: Brake conversions
I much prefer our's on the van to those on the Passat ... big braking power (as Si say's in very good condition with new rear back plates, cylinders, drums, shoes and fittings etc 2 years ago) and not as on or off as the all round disc brakes on the car.
Ian
Ian
The Hulley's Bus
1989 2.1DJ Trampspotter
LPG courtesy of Steve @ Gasure
1989 2.1DJ Trampspotter
LPG courtesy of Steve @ Gasure
-
- Registered user
- Posts: 2673
- Joined: 03 Apr 2007, 12:54
- 80-90 Mem No: 8386
- Location: Nottingham
Re: Brake conversions
While we are on the subject: Just been asked a question about the T25's brake regulators and thought it would be a good topic for discussion.
Whilst I cannot see any explaination of their precise operation I have managed to find a couple of pictures buried in the Vanagon manual. Looking at the pictures I believe the front of the vehicle is to the left and looking at the 'testing' information it seems to imply that mounted in it's normal position (30 degrees nose up) the brake fluid pressure is set even between front and rear whilst the vehicle isn't moving or at a constant speed. However, under braking, pressure is reduced to the rear brakes dependant upon decelleration and or vehicle angle under braking (dive).
Does the Bently or other information have a definitive description of this? I assume that the regulator has a ball bearing or plunger operated by inertia or angle? that controls the degree of brake pressure restriction to the rear brakes.


Martin
Whilst I cannot see any explaination of their precise operation I have managed to find a couple of pictures buried in the Vanagon manual. Looking at the pictures I believe the front of the vehicle is to the left and looking at the 'testing' information it seems to imply that mounted in it's normal position (30 degrees nose up) the brake fluid pressure is set even between front and rear whilst the vehicle isn't moving or at a constant speed. However, under braking, pressure is reduced to the rear brakes dependant upon decelleration and or vehicle angle under braking (dive).
Does the Bently or other information have a definitive description of this? I assume that the regulator has a ball bearing or plunger operated by inertia or angle? that controls the degree of brake pressure restriction to the rear brakes.


Martin
1989 California 2.1MV