Cab step an MOT fail?

Thin bits of metal and bright blue light.

Moderators: User administrators, Moderators

andysimpson
Registered user
Posts: 213
Joined: 19 Oct 2005, 21:15
80-90 Mem No: 0
Location: Chorley, Lancs

Post by andysimpson »

vanjam wrote:cheers for that, it's frightening stuff. If the seats are about to fall out of the bottom of the vehicle, it still passes and granny bites the dust if she hasn't alreadt severed her leg on the deacying, corradoed step on the way in!

I'm going to do some research on the regualtions that underpin the MOT. Don't ujs fail the test if the inherent protection for them i.e the greasy boot has failed? Surely that's a measure of checking against corrosion and decay

Cheers

Jim

Only splitt boot on front outer driveshaft joints are fails others are advises.

Seen as you brought up seats, if the seat is removable (most people carriers) the seat belt is not a testable item.

User avatar
vanjam
Registered user
Posts: 31
Joined: 25 Feb 2006, 02:54
80-90 Mem No: 1966
Location: shrewsbury, shropshire

Post by vanjam »

andy, this is interesting stuff: seats aside (if you'll excuse the pun) and focussing on the ujs, why have I been failed (not advised) on inboards on both rear and fronts in the past? Is the detailed guidance given to testers such as yourself in the public domain and are you guys just intepreting it differrently and, if so, why?
1985 1900DG wc liesuredrive hitop with small amounts of rust

Cruz
Registered user
Posts: 3919
Joined: 12 Oct 2005, 10:40
80-90 Mem No: 2092

Post by Cruz »

I've opened up a can of worms here.

Reckon mine will pass but I'll be getting a Schofield one fitted, most likely in the autumn after camping season has ended. After all it's my step, my risk and I'm as light as a feather when getting in :wink:

andysimpson
Registered user
Posts: 213
Joined: 19 Oct 2005, 21:15
80-90 Mem No: 0
Location: Chorley, Lancs

Post by andysimpson »

vanjam wrote:andy, this is interesting stuff: seats aside (if you'll excuse the pun) and focussing on the ujs, why have I been failed (not advised) on inboards on both rear and fronts in the past? Is the detailed guidance given to testers such as yourself in the public domain and are you guys just intepreting it differrently and, if so, why?

Its testers making the rules up as they go. The book only mentions front outer and bolts holding on the inners but not the joints. Propshafts don't even get a mention in the book. If it is not listed as a reason for rejection its a pass.

User avatar
vanjam
Registered user
Posts: 31
Joined: 25 Feb 2006, 02:54
80-90 Mem No: 1966
Location: shrewsbury, shropshire

Post by vanjam »

cheers andy, I'll bear that in mind in future and keep a closer eye
jim
1985 1900DG wc liesuredrive hitop with small amounts of rust

Cruz
Registered user
Posts: 3919
Joined: 12 Oct 2005, 10:40
80-90 Mem No: 2092

Post by Cruz »

Passed the MOT :D

woody1977
Registered user
Posts: 72
Joined: 03 May 2006, 13:08
80-90 Mem No: 3077
Location: DARTFORD

Post by woody1977 »

while your on the subject of passing mots.. will my van fail for having the key half snapped off in the ignition? or not having a rear bumper?

andysimpson
Registered user
Posts: 213
Joined: 19 Oct 2005, 21:15
80-90 Mem No: 0
Location: Chorley, Lancs

Post by andysimpson »

woody1977 wrote:while your on the subject of passing mots.. will my van fail for having the key half snapped off in the ignition? or not having a rear bumper?

Thats fine. Bumper is only a fail if its damaged. Ignition key does not matter.

woody1977
Registered user
Posts: 72
Joined: 03 May 2006, 13:08
80-90 Mem No: 3077
Location: DARTFORD

Post by woody1977 »

cool cheers.Image

Locked