Dizzy Vacuum - Ported or Manifold?
Posted: 06 Mar 2014, 16:11
Right, a theoretical question for you all...
I have a new set of twin carbs and have been looking at vacuum ports for connecting the dizzy advance to. There is a port on each carb body, with small hole into the venturi immediately above the throttle plate. My understanding (mainly from TheSamba.com) is I 'T' these together and run the dizzy off these. However, comparing to my old single weber I noted that the vacuum port is below the throttle plate.
Foolishly I then searched the internet to try and understand why they were different.
It seems that manifold vacuum is actually preferable and results in a lower heat idle (but higher emissions) than the ported vacuum. Ported vacuums are an emissions led compromise. However, it seems that the dizzy advance on the T25 is more suited to the ported vacuum.
So which is better, and where is the Pierberg vacuum taken from?
Cheers,
Alex
I have a new set of twin carbs and have been looking at vacuum ports for connecting the dizzy advance to. There is a port on each carb body, with small hole into the venturi immediately above the throttle plate. My understanding (mainly from TheSamba.com) is I 'T' these together and run the dizzy off these. However, comparing to my old single weber I noted that the vacuum port is below the throttle plate.
Foolishly I then searched the internet to try and understand why they were different.
It seems that manifold vacuum is actually preferable and results in a lower heat idle (but higher emissions) than the ported vacuum. Ported vacuums are an emissions led compromise. However, it seems that the dizzy advance on the T25 is more suited to the ported vacuum.
So which is better, and where is the Pierberg vacuum taken from?
Cheers,
Alex