How Fast.

Post it here, if it doesn't fit any of the above.

Moderators: User administrators, Moderators

Ralf85
Registered user
Posts: 4447
Joined: 13 Jan 2010, 12:42
80-90 Mem No: 4418
Location: West London - 1985 westie pop top, LHD, 1900 DF engine

Re: How Fast.

Post by Ralf85 »

silverbullet wrote:Because any speedo is always set to read a good 5% fast. Bigger tyres mean more distance covered per revolution, so the speedo then reads proportionately lower i.e. closer to true road speed.
So why are speedo's set to be incorrect?

silverbullet
Trader
Posts: 17252
Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 09:51
80-90 Mem No: 6908
Location: Surrey Syncronaut #156
Contact:

Re: How Fast.

Post by silverbullet »

Fair point. Heavy van uses more fuel to accelerate.
[pedant v2.0]Tintops have an abrupt front screen frame/roof intersection, which makes for turbulence amd so more drag. A Dehler is the most aerodynamically efficient shape for a T3 generally available[/pedant]
Last edited by silverbullet on 06 Dec 2015, 16:25, edited 1 time in total.
1985 Oettinger 3.2 Caravelle RHD syncro twin slider. SA Microbus bumpers, duplex winch system, ARC 7X15 period alloys

silverbullet
Trader
Posts: 17252
Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 09:51
80-90 Mem No: 6908
Location: Surrey Syncronaut #156
Contact:

Re: How Fast.

Post by silverbullet »

Speedo always reads low because it allows for manufacturing innacuracies. No manufacturer wants to be sued for a duff speedo that results in excessive speed and the legal fallout that results
1985 Oettinger 3.2 Caravelle RHD syncro twin slider. SA Microbus bumpers, duplex winch system, ARC 7X15 period alloys

User avatar
CJH
Registered user
Posts: 3018
Joined: 15 Jul 2013, 06:51
80-90 Mem No: 12576
Location: Nottingham

Re: How Fast.

Post by CJH »

silverbullet wrote: [pedant v2.0]Tintops have an abrupt front screen frame/roof intersection, which makes for turbulence amd so more drag. A Dehler is the most aerodynamically efficient shape for a T3 generally available[/pedant]

You could well be right. What about the low pressure area behind the van - is that any different with a Dehler roof?

silverbullet wrote:Fair point. Heavy van uses more fuel to get to the same speed.

[pendant mode again] Fixed that for you :D
If a light van and a heavy van both accelerate with foot to the floor, then the heavy van won't accelerate as fast, but neither will it use more fuel at that moment - it'll use the same fuel as the lighter van to generate the same maximum force. It's the secondary effect, whereby it has to provide that force for longer to get to the same speed, that increases fuel consumption.[/pedant]
"I'm a man of means, by no means....King of the Road!"

1983 Viking Xplorer, 2.1DJ

silverbullet
Trader
Posts: 17252
Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 09:51
80-90 Mem No: 6908
Location: Surrey Syncronaut #156
Contact:

Re: How Fast.

Post by silverbullet »

Pedantry is such fun!

The Dehler top gets the side profile a good bit closer to optimal (all things considered), the more gradual transition from screen angle to horizontal and then a slight reversal in gradient is more like that seen on current artic' trailers; the Dehler does have a step down at the back for the luggage rack but you get my point.
The Jaeger mid-top looks like quite a good shape but lacks the reverse taper as it tails off.
My Dehler/rooftent with its tonneau cover doesnt flap at any speed afaik which suggests good flow and minimal turbulence over the top.
What the wake must be like is anyone's guess :lol:
1985 Oettinger 3.2 Caravelle RHD syncro twin slider. SA Microbus bumpers, duplex winch system, ARC 7X15 period alloys

Post Reply