Page 2 of 2
Re: New exhuast - painting
Posted: 25 Dec 2013, 08:04
by StuM
Thanks Kev.
Re: New exhuast - painting
Posted: 25 Dec 2013, 11:56
by jason k
kevtherev wrote:both.
I believe one was on a van as it was on a dyno. by coinsidence.
not massive power loss..but it certainly did not help.
The worst thing about them is the alarming rate of rotting
mine kev!
throughout the rev rang it was causing a harmonic imbalance, binned it for a stock one and made 4bhp!!
Re: New exhuast - painting
Posted: 25 Dec 2013, 13:01
by kevtherev
I dint like to say you fitted a lemon..

Re: New exhuast - painting
Posted: 25 Dec 2013, 17:21
by jason k
Its all a learning curve Kev!!
My first van was a very steep and expensive learning curve!!!
Re: New exhuast - painting
Posted: 27 Dec 2013, 21:46
by biker1981
hmmmm.... maybe I will send mine back.
thought I was buying an improvement

Re: New exhuast - painting
Posted: 27 Dec 2013, 22:57
by jason k
Nope! Stock box flows well to 100 bhp or so.
Ditch the power robbing heat exchangers if you want more grunt
See turbo Thomas for replacement j tubes.
Re: New exhuast - painting
Posted: 27 Dec 2013, 23:10
by AdrianC
jason k wrote:Nope! Stock box flows well to 100 bhp or so.
North of that for the late-style watercooled system. 112bhp from the factory from DJs.
Re: New exhuast - painting
Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 09:59
by jason k
Good ppint, i should clarify We're talking early systems here as the empi only fits Aircooled or pre 85 systems.
Personally I was talking air cooled where my dyno experience with these empi piles of poo lay!