Page 1 of 1

these ball joint spacers look well made!

Posted: 12 Aug 2010, 15:44
by axeman
http://www.syncrohospital.co.za/listDet ... ?Itemid=89" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

the burley ones looked alot thiner, these seam to have a lot more meat on them,

neil

Re: these ball joint spacers look well made!

Posted: 12 Aug 2010, 16:29
by silverbullet
Beefy but a bit clunky. I would much rather CNC mill them from EN8 steel and have them plated, if I wanted some. Alloy is not the material to use in such a critical location, when all the rest of the suspension is high-tensile steel IMHO.
Clive? Opinion please!

Re: these ball joint spacers look well made!

Posted: 12 Aug 2010, 17:32
by Russel
Well i have been using and very much abusing a set from Stuart "syncro hospital" for over 2 years now and they are still going strong.
Russel

Re: these ball joint spacers look well made!

Posted: 12 Aug 2010, 22:24
by syncropaddy
silverbullet wrote:Beefy but a bit clunky. I would much rather CNC mill them from EN8 steel and have them plated, if I wanted some. Alloy is not the material to use in such a critical location, when all the rest of the suspension is high-tensile steel IMHO.
Clive? Opinion please!

I reckon that the alloy is fine if machined accurately and the correct spec location bolts used. There is a heck of a lot of steel in my suspension and very little of it is H/T and if you look under the Range Rover that is sitting on my driveway you will see lots of alloy making up the suspension components!

Re: these ball joint spacers look well made!

Posted: 13 Aug 2010, 08:44
by silverbullet
SP, I used to have a late BA chassis with a 2.5 VM Turbo D. Been there, done that, saw the error of my ways!
IME, suspension parts get made from aluminium alloy for two main reasons:
1.To save unsprung weight
2.It's easier to machine than steel
So:
1.Saving weight on a T3 syncro? Drop your shorts before you go out - weight saved and driver mood improved :lol:
2.If it's easier to machine, it's easier to deform too. That's what troubles me about using alloy in this application.
I'm not dissing syncrohospital, I'd just rather have steel on my wagon.

Re: these ball joint spacers look well made!

Posted: 13 Aug 2010, 10:29
by syncropaddy
silverbullet wrote:SP, I used to have a late BA chassis with a 2.5 VM Turbo D. Been there, done that, saw the error of my ways!

Its a bit newer than that ......

silverbullet wrote:Saving weight on a T3 syncro? Drop your shorts before you go out - weight saved and driver mood improved :lol:

Hehehehe ................. :D

silverbullet wrote:If it's easier to machine, it's easier to deform too.

Agree but in this application ? it would also depend on the aluminium used as well. There is some lovely stuff available out there, I used to sell it years ago - along with Hitachi Seiki, Bridgeport, Harrison, Trumph, Sandvik, Iscar, Dormer and a few other bits and pieces!

Re: these ball joint spacers look well made!

Posted: 13 Aug 2010, 12:31
by silverbullet
Now we're talking the same language...

Re: these ball joint spacers look well made!

Posted: 23 Aug 2010, 19:05
by syncrodoug
You may wish to compare it with one that is not particularly well made but hopefully doing the same job!

Image

Re: these ball joint spacers look well made!

Posted: 23 Aug 2010, 19:23
by jed the spread
Russel at Syncro-Nutz wrote:Well i have been using and very much abusing a set from Stuart "syncro hospital" for over 2 years now and they are still going strong.
Russel

Is this that Stuart we camped with a couple of years back?

jed

Re: these ball joint spacers look well made!

Posted: 23 Aug 2010, 19:53
by Russel
Yes