CU / CT differences, using GVW to determine original spec
Posted: 13 Jul 2018, 13:11
More of an answer than a question, but more info welcomed.
In the course of the thread below some doubt was cast on whether my orange van was originally a CU as it has a cable clutch fitted and I've been doing some more detective work today.
https://club8090.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=165002
I checked the VIN number out again, from which I know my van was built in Hannover. Crucially the VIN plate also has vehicle weights on.
Armed with my 1981 brochure I checked the GVW which is stated to be 2360kg. This converts to 5204 lbs, yes UK brochures were in pounds back then, both 1600 and 2000 cc models have the same GVW. Axle weights are the same, but the answer came from the towing capacities.
Braked towing capacities are stated as 2205 lbs and 2645 lbs for the 2000. That's 1000 kg for the CT and 1200 kg for the CU.
So if you have a combined weight of 3360kg the van was originally a 1600, if it says 3560kg it was originally a CU.
Mine was originally a 1600
As I said in the other thread, I'm not really bothered as my van has the correct DK gearbox fitted, but I am interested in knowing if there were any other differences. From the brochure the only difference I can see other than the clutch is that the CU had radial tyres while the CT had cross plies.
In the course of the thread below some doubt was cast on whether my orange van was originally a CU as it has a cable clutch fitted and I've been doing some more detective work today.
https://club8090.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=165002
I checked the VIN number out again, from which I know my van was built in Hannover. Crucially the VIN plate also has vehicle weights on.
Armed with my 1981 brochure I checked the GVW which is stated to be 2360kg. This converts to 5204 lbs, yes UK brochures were in pounds back then, both 1600 and 2000 cc models have the same GVW. Axle weights are the same, but the answer came from the towing capacities.
Braked towing capacities are stated as 2205 lbs and 2645 lbs for the 2000. That's 1000 kg for the CT and 1200 kg for the CU.
So if you have a combined weight of 3360kg the van was originally a 1600, if it says 3560kg it was originally a CU.
Mine was originally a 1600
As I said in the other thread, I'm not really bothered as my van has the correct DK gearbox fitted, but I am interested in knowing if there were any other differences. From the brochure the only difference I can see other than the clutch is that the CU had radial tyres while the CT had cross plies.