Page 7 of 30

Re: WBXlog

Posted: 03 Nov 2016, 10:36
by ajsimmo
itchyfeet wrote:He said don't get involved fixing otter peoples vans if they aren't paying :rofl
"Have you fixed my van yet?"
Image

Re: WBXlog

Posted: 03 Nov 2016, 10:37
by ajsimmo
Image

Re: WBXlog

Posted: 05 Nov 2016, 14:41
by ajsimmo
No...? Nobody?
I'll get my coat.
:run

Re: WBXlog

Posted: 06 Nov 2016, 16:53
by itchyfeet
Back to the thread :D

Finished the other engine reseal today so the DJ is back on the hydraulic table :D
Pistons ready, rings have arrived so crack on with that tomorrow.

https://club8090.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.p ... 3#p8163832" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

ImageP1060230 by Paul_Barr, on Flickr

Re: WBXlog

Posted: 07 Nov 2016, 08:03
by ajsimmo
Which ring set have you gone for? I expect BW KS, but just in case...
Just found that the VWH set is not Bosch (as advertised) but Grant's standard set without the chrome top ring. No good to me then! Also they state they fit DJ and MV, yet Grant's listing states different sets with different oil ring - 3.5mm for DJ / 4mm MV (same as DG).
I'll be measuring my piston stash later.

Re: WBXlog

Posted: 07 Nov 2016, 08:50
by itchyfeet
Interesting, thanks for the heads up

I will measure too.

I noticed when removing the old rings the top ring was different from DG heavy spring to it very hard to get off by hand and hard to break too ( wanted a bit to clean grooves out) , had to stretch it way open before it broke.

got these as you suspected

https://www.brickwerks.co.uk/t3-parts/e ... iston.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

ajsimmo wrote: I'll be measuring my piston stash later.

I suspect that may take some time :D

Re: WBXlog

Posted: 07 Nov 2016, 10:21
by ajsimmo
Lol thankfully I didn't have to do them all!
Results are....
Grant's spec sheet is wrong, VWH are right! Nominal 3.5mm groove on MV & DJ, 4.0mm on DG.

Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk

Re: WBXlog

Posted: 07 Nov 2016, 19:40
by itchyfeet
Gudgeons are all very tight in these pistons, looks like they were hammered out, VW had problems with burrs on the pistons so made a reamer tool but most of us don't have them so have to hammer pins out
I used the 24mm reamer to loosen them up, not too much but just enough to be able to get them through by hand.

ImageP1060231 by Paul_Barr, on Flickr

ImageP1060232 by Paul_Barr, on Flickr

Cleaned out ring grooves with an old broken ring, middle ring grove was particularly dirty.
Cleaned the oil holes with a 2.5mm drill

ImageP1060233 by Paul_Barr, on Flickr

Cleaned any dirt of the outside with 1200 wet and dry then blasted them with carb cleaner to get any swarf and debris off ( don't get it in your eye it hurts :lol: )

ImageP1060235 by Paul_Barr, on Flickr

Matched biggest most worn barrel with biggest least worn piston, max allowed is 0.2mm

1 94.04/93.97 = 0.07mm
2 94.02/93.96 = 0.06mm
3 94.02/93.92 = 0.04mm
4 94.06/93.97 = 0.09mm

ImageP1060236 by Paul_Barr, on Flickr

These are the rings from Brickwerks
ImageP1060252 by Paul_Barr, on Flickr

wasn't expecting the oil control ring to look like this :? (old one removed on the left which looks like the DG ones I just fitted but 3.5mm wide)

ImageP1060243 by Paul_Barr, on Flickr

Must fit like this, job for tomorrow.

ImageP1060248 by Paul_Barr, on Flickr

Re: WBXlog

Posted: 08 Nov 2016, 07:45
by itchyfeet
itchyfeet wrote: otter peoples vans

Get it now :lol:

Re: WBXlog

Posted: 08 Nov 2016, 19:47
by itchyfeet
Measured ring gaps tonight ( been here before with the DG pistons), all a bit higher than I'd liked even with the virtually standard size barrel but still within wear limit spec of 0.9 or 0.95mm, these rings must be smaller than the original VW. Oil scraper and middle ring 0.7mm, top ring 0.6mm :roll:

ImageP1060254 by Paul_Barr, on Flickr

important to get the pistons and barrels arranged so rings go on the right way up, oil control and top compression gaps always up which means 1&2 are different to 3&4, centre rings always down, arrows always to flywheel.

ImageP1060263 by Paul_Barr, on Flickr

Oil control rings went on easily but I got the idea of staggering them, can't see any good reason not to and would help I assume, can't see then staying aligned anyway

ImageP1060265 by Paul_Barr, on Flickr

No way could I got the top ring on by hand, much stiffer than the DG, had to get the expander tool on it.

ImageP1060266 by Paul_Barr, on Flickr

finally checked ring groove wear, all Ok and within spec.
ImageP1060273 by Paul_Barr, on Flickr

Re: WBXlog

Posted: 09 Nov 2016, 08:27
by ajsimmo
itchyfeet wrote:
itchyfeet wrote: otter peoples vans

Get it now :lol:
Lmao. How long did you stare at it......!?

Re: WBXlog

Posted: 09 Nov 2016, 09:17
by what2do
ajsimmo wrote:
itchyfeet wrote:
itchyfeet wrote: otter peoples vans

Get it now :lol:
Lmao. How long did you stare at it......!?

Doesn't matter what he looks at these days, all he sees is wbx components!

Re: WBXlog

Posted: 09 Nov 2016, 10:18
by itchyfeet
ajsimmo wrote: Lmao. How long did you stare at it......!?

Kept thinking head seal :rofl

Re: WBXlog

Posted: 09 Nov 2016, 10:22
by marlinowner
My advice would be to keep beavering away.

Re: WBXlog

Posted: 09 Nov 2016, 13:12
by itchyfeet
what2do wrote: Doesn't matter what he looks at these days, all he sees is wbx components!

Waterboxer :D

Image