Page 5 of 9
Re: aerodynamics
Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 14:37
by boxer
'special roof or even a residential building' Loving the translation there boatbuilder . But at least I know my plan to fill in the 'roof rack' is a 'gooden'.
Re the vents in the rear panel. Could you test it by jamming open the 'numberplate' flap?
Re: aerodynamics
Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 15:11
by Fin
I had the same problem with mine, I'm sure the spare wheel holder doesn't help its like a big wing.
I'm running 260bhp from a Scooby engine - and Aiden built me a gear box which apparently is good for 144mph
I've had her up to 120 so far - on a closed road obviously - it kind stops getting any faster after that - as I guess it's not slippy enough to go any faster
I thought of two solutions
1) fit a Thule roof rack spoiler above the cab (mines a pickup) this works well - might try a less abrupt angle soon
2) I'm going to see if I can mount my charge cooler rad inside the spare wheel holder and drop it down slightly at the front with a spacer and longer bolts so the air pushes down on to it rather than up from the bottom
Re: aerodynamics
Posted: 04 Mar 2013, 13:02
by silverbullet
Geared for 144mph
Pickup trucks are always better with a rigid tonneau over the dropsides it would seem. Mythbusters proved it after testing with tailgate up/down/removed/covered.
So it must be true

Re: aerodynamics
Posted: 04 Mar 2013, 19:55
by Fin
Aah nice.
Yeh might see if I can get some carbon loveliness
And maybe a huge GT wing
Re: aerodynamics
Posted: 04 Mar 2013, 21:12
by faggie
my old van had a different engine lid arrangement and at speeds of 100mph or more the engine cover used to lift , so to cure this i always added weight to the cover when driving at motorway speeds
Re: aerodynamics
Posted: 04 Mar 2013, 21:47
by Fin
I currently have to carry 50 liters of water when I'm at Castle coombe race track.
Just to keep the rear wheels in traction

Re: aerodynamics
Posted: 05 Mar 2013, 08:27
by boxer
Jeez! I'm just trying to keep the front wheels on the floor at 50mph! It's another world! Take you point about the wheel carrier underneath though.
Re: aerodynamics
Posted: 05 Mar 2013, 13:07
by trentjim
looks like someone was a high top fan in devising the experiment to make them look good by using the Dehler...
I'd bet a westie high top in particular would have more drag than the pop-top...
Re: aerodynamics
Posted: 05 Mar 2013, 13:20
by clift_d
Um, no actually - see AdrianC's post earlier in the thread
https://club8090.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.p ... 6#p7855366" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The pop-top seems to perform slightly worse because the transitions aren't so good
Re: aerodynamics
Posted: 06 Mar 2013, 13:25
by trentjim
aah yes,
Missed that one, I do like it when evidence tramples on my preconcieved notions!!
James
Re: aerodynamics
Posted: 06 Mar 2013, 20:07
by Ralf85
Re: aerodynamics
Posted: 06 Mar 2013, 22:15
by Fin
Yeh, when you wanna push one through the air at 80 +
It's nice to know you aren't gonna damage the china.

Re: aerodynamics
Posted: 07 Mar 2013, 11:46
by trentjim
We could put a positive spin on and call it "High speed braking assistance"
Re: aerodynamics
Posted: 07 Mar 2013, 14:20
by silverbullet
Bricks or not, it still has to push the air out of the way. Not all these vans are driven around at 45 mph

Re: aerodynamics
Posted: 07 Mar 2013, 15:21
by Fin
Maybe we should make a great big nose cone like Concord
