Page 5 of 9

Re: aerodynamics

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 14:37
by boxer
'special roof or even a residential building' Loving the translation there boatbuilder . But at least I know my plan to fill in the 'roof rack' is a 'gooden'.


Re the vents in the rear panel. Could you test it by jamming open the 'numberplate' flap?

Re: aerodynamics

Posted: 02 Mar 2013, 15:11
by Fin
I had the same problem with mine, I'm sure the spare wheel holder doesn't help its like a big wing.
I'm running 260bhp from a Scooby engine - and Aiden built me a gear box which apparently is good for 144mph
I've had her up to 120 so far - on a closed road obviously - it kind stops getting any faster after that - as I guess it's not slippy enough to go any faster

I thought of two solutions

1) fit a Thule roof rack spoiler above the cab (mines a pickup) this works well - might try a less abrupt angle soon

Image

2) I'm going to see if I can mount my charge cooler rad inside the spare wheel holder and drop it down slightly at the front with a spacer and longer bolts so the air pushes down on to it rather than up from the bottom

Re: aerodynamics

Posted: 04 Mar 2013, 13:02
by silverbullet
Geared for 144mph :shock:

Pickup trucks are always better with a rigid tonneau over the dropsides it would seem. Mythbusters proved it after testing with tailgate up/down/removed/covered.

So it must be true :lol:

Re: aerodynamics

Posted: 04 Mar 2013, 19:55
by Fin
Aah nice.
Yeh might see if I can get some carbon loveliness
And maybe a huge GT wing

Re: aerodynamics

Posted: 04 Mar 2013, 21:12
by faggie
my old van had a different engine lid arrangement and at speeds of 100mph or more the engine cover used to lift , so to cure this i always added weight to the cover when driving at motorway speeds

Re: aerodynamics

Posted: 04 Mar 2013, 21:47
by Fin
I currently have to carry 50 liters of water when I'm at Castle coombe race track.
Just to keep the rear wheels in traction :)

Re: aerodynamics

Posted: 05 Mar 2013, 08:27
by boxer
Jeez! I'm just trying to keep the front wheels on the floor at 50mph! It's another world! Take you point about the wheel carrier underneath though.

Re: aerodynamics

Posted: 05 Mar 2013, 13:07
by trentjim
looks like someone was a high top fan in devising the experiment to make them look good by using the Dehler...
I'd bet a westie high top in particular would have more drag than the pop-top...

Re: aerodynamics

Posted: 05 Mar 2013, 13:20
by clift_d
Um, no actually - see AdrianC's post earlier in the thread

https://club8090.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.p ... 6#p7855366" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The pop-top seems to perform slightly worse because the transitions aren't so good

Re: aerodynamics

Posted: 06 Mar 2013, 13:25
by trentjim
aah yes,
Missed that one, I do like it when evidence tramples on my preconcieved notions!!
James

Re: aerodynamics

Posted: 06 Mar 2013, 20:07
by Ralf85
Aerodynamics - when we drive bricks.
:rofl :rofl :rofl

Re: aerodynamics

Posted: 06 Mar 2013, 22:15
by Fin
Yeh, when you wanna push one through the air at 80 +
It's nice to know you aren't gonna damage the china.
:ok

Re: aerodynamics

Posted: 07 Mar 2013, 11:46
by trentjim
Ralf85 wrote:Aerodynamics - when we drive bricks.
:rofl :rofl :rofl

We could put a positive spin on and call it "High speed braking assistance"

Re: aerodynamics

Posted: 07 Mar 2013, 14:20
by silverbullet
Bricks or not, it still has to push the air out of the way. Not all these vans are driven around at 45 mph :wink:

Re: aerodynamics

Posted: 07 Mar 2013, 15:21
by Fin
Maybe we should make a great big nose cone like Concord :ok