Page 3 of 3
Re: Production figures.
Posted: 20 May 2012, 21:34
by jebiga41

Doesn't look like a panel van to me

Re: Production figures.
Posted: 20 May 2012, 22:28
by jed the spread
syncropaddy wrote:jebiga41 wrote:syncropaddy wrote:RHD Panel Vans are the new cool ......

But you don't have one Andrew your vans got windows
Not according to the log book ......
Your going to have to change your user names you two to,
Syncrobrûlée and Jebiga The Spread

....
Jed
Re: Production figures.
Posted: 20 May 2012, 22:55
by jebiga41
jed the spread wrote:Your going to have to change your user names you two to,
Syncrobrûlée and Jebiga The Spread

....
Jed
You obviously don't know what Jebiga means Jed, jebi is the verb to F*** ga is him or it

Re: Production figures.
Posted: 20 May 2012, 23:13
by syncropaddy
jebiga41 wrote:jed the spread wrote:Your going to have to change your user names you two to,
Syncrobrûlée and Jebiga The Spread

....
Jed
You obviously don't know what Jebiga means Jed, jebi is the verb to F*** ga is him or it

So whats the 41 then ...... your IQ?

Re: Production figures.
Posted: 20 May 2012, 23:33
by jebiga41

no just the no of times

Re: Production figures.
Posted: 20 May 2012, 23:45
by jebiga41
Another ditty for you Andrew
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfeyUGZt ... ata_player" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Production figures.
Posted: 28 Sep 2013, 21:21
by dugwiththevwbug
Late to the fold but I have just acquired an 86 Syncro Rhd converted panel van Jx turbo it's more of a project than a runner but it's a keeper ( one of the 208 gang;-) )
Re: Production figures.
Posted: 29 Sep 2013, 19:41
by tforturton
Going right back to the original post - what are the figures in brackets?
Re: Production figures.
Posted: 29 Sep 2013, 19:44
by lloydy
The 253 and 255? if so, its just the vw code for a carravelle and kombi.
Re: Production figures.
Posted: 29 Sep 2013, 19:50
by max and caddy
dugwiththevwbug wrote:Late to the fold but I have just acquired an 86 Syncro Rhd converted panel van Jx turbo it's more of a project than a runner but it's a keeper ( one of the 208 gang;-) )
Spose im in this gang as well then? Where the 208 figure from?
Re: Production figures.
Posted: 30 Sep 2013, 00:25
by SYMCRO
That small text file with Syncro info on it came from this, (which was produced over 10 years ago) & still lurks somewhere on this site.
http://www.club80-90syncro.co.uk/Syncro ... 0STORY.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Production figures.
Posted: 30 Sep 2013, 10:20
by tforturton
So a RHD Syncro, of any type, is rarer than any 16" model?
I'd be interested to know how many RHD Caravelles were built.
Re: Production figures.
Posted: 30 Sep 2013, 12:51
by Syncrobaz
I'm a 252 man myself

Less than 300 made 'apparently'

Re: Production figures.
Posted: 30 Sep 2013, 16:23
by silverbullet
tforturton wrote:So a RHD Syncro, of any type, is rarer than any 16" model?
I'd be interested to know how many RHD Caravelles were built.
All the numbers are approximate, but I believe the reckoning is that if the proportion of lhd to rhd is anything to go by (2108/43468) that's ~5% RHD
for any given model, but popularity, demand and availability was variable so nothing is certain...
Minibuses (M253) 14650 Produced
Many different types of minibus versions were available, ranging from 8 to 12 seats. They were however only supplied with the 1.9 petrol or 1.6 diesel & turbo diesel engines & were not available as Syncro’s in the UK.
Caravelles (M255) 14334 Produced
UK Supplied Caravelles were all fitted with 2.1 litre engines.
By those tokens, our RHD 1.9 1986 Caravelle C twin-slider bus (Type 256, it was built as an 11 seater I think, 3+4+4) shouldn't exist! But in the early days, it's rumoured that you took what you could get or waited a while.
IIRC Aidan once said that each big M-code variant represents about 10%, so our one may be one of ~14000 x 5% x 10% for the twin sliders i.e. one of around 70. I haven't been bothered to get a birth cert. from VW and the M-code sticker is long gone... whatever you've got, there's unlikely to be another that was made quite the same.