Page 2 of 2
Posted: 04 Jul 2007, 20:22
by R0B
hmmm..c reg was 01 August 1985/31 July 1986.so i doubt very much it was an Aircooled.iirc the air cooled was made upto 84.does it look like a new front panel has been fitted at any point...
Posted: 04 Jul 2007, 21:21
by budbombpipe
It doesn't look obvious that the panel has been replaced, but i surpose it could of been done well. Just can't see why someone would go to the trouble of fitting an Aircooled panel on a watercooler. The lower grill that was covering the panel went from indicater to indicater (South African??)
Posted: 04 Jul 2007, 21:34
by R0B
neither can i.tis all very strange....
Just can't see why someone would go to the trouble of fitting an Aircooled panel on a watercooler
Posted: 04 Jul 2007, 21:42
by kevtherev
maybe it was fitted for the same reasons I would ......aesthetics!
Posted: 04 Jul 2007, 21:48
by R0B
but it should have a hole...
Posted: 04 Jul 2007, 21:54
by kevtherev
With the SA grill it shouldn't be much of a bother to create one eh?
Posted: 04 Jul 2007, 21:58
by R0B
should be no problem at all.but why it isnt there to begin with is very odd.to say the least.
With the SA grill it shouldn't be much of a bother to create one eh?
Posted: 06 Jul 2007, 12:42
by Mocki
seeings as the rad is colled in main by the lower grill, it would not be a clever idea to block it off.......... i suspect that the original poster has overheating isuues........
plop
Posted: 07 Jul 2007, 07:10
by dridgy
did it overheat?
id be intersted to know as i was also thinking of blocking it off like kev.
it looks so much nicer without that horrible grill.