1.6 or 2.0?

Big lumps of metals and spanners. Including servicing and fluids.

Moderators: User administrators, Moderators

Post Reply
Sir Brixalot
Registered user
Posts: 4569
Joined: 15 Oct 2010, 21:55
80-90 Mem No: 8927
Location: London

1.6 or 2.0?

Post by Sir Brixalot »

Never had an Aircooled. Can anyone tell me if this is  2.0 or 1.6? As far as you can tell from a photo does it look OK and not messed with?

Image
Honorary "Dave" 

 

davidoft1
Trader
Posts: 2589
Joined: 27 May 2009, 18:56
80-90 Mem No: 16628
Location: hayling island

Re: 1.6 or 2.0?

Post by davidoft1 »

Sir Brixalot wrote: 24 Dec 2020, 14:00 Never had an Aircooled. Can anyone tell me if this is  2.0 or 1.6? As far as you can tell from a photo does it look OK and not messed with?

Image

2ltr CU code

User avatar
ajsimmo
Trader
Posts: 2701
Joined: 23 Mar 2009, 14:06
80-90 Mem No: 6542
Location: Isle of Arran
Contact:

Re: 1.6 or 2.0?

Post by ajsimmo »

And the second part of the question - one thing stands out, the vacuum pipes are missing on the retard side so you may have a high idle speed or incorrect ignition timing. Not ideal, especially on an auto! Also, the advance pipe goes to the wrong carb. Check that the redundant spigots are effectively blanked off, LHS carb (ported), and idle circuit pipe behind airbox.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk


The Campershack - (website paused)
WBX Rebuilds & Upgrades from the beautiful Isle of Arran

Rosie n' Jim
Registered user
Posts: 191
Joined: 06 Sep 2020, 06:40
80-90 Mem No: 0

Re: 1.6 or 2.0?

Post by Rosie n' Jim »

His 1.9 DG is an auto, no mention of the Aircooled gearbox. In addition to the retard pipe missing, the mixsing engine tinware seal is vital to keep the engine cool. Well, maybe not today, it's blinking cold out there! There's a ware line on the engine bay, so must have had one recently. 
1982 Holdsworth poptop. 2L CU Aircooled.
1982 Danbury tintop Caravelle. 2L CU Aircooled.

Rosie n' Jim
Registered user
Posts: 191
Joined: 06 Sep 2020, 06:40
80-90 Mem No: 0

Re: 1.6 or 2.0?

Post by Rosie n' Jim »

Looking closer, there is a seal, but it is not touching the engine bay sides. Maybe the engine mounts are shot letting the engine e sag down?
1982 Holdsworth poptop. 2L CU Aircooled.
1982 Danbury tintop Caravelle. 2L CU Aircooled.

Sir Brixalot
Registered user
Posts: 4569
Joined: 15 Oct 2010, 21:55
80-90 Mem No: 8927
Location: London

Re: 1.6 or 2.0?

Post by Sir Brixalot »

Thanks for the input.  I'll go(with armed some vacuum hose) and have a look if its still around after lockdown. 
Honorary "Dave" 

 

User avatar
ajsimmo
Trader
Posts: 2701
Joined: 23 Mar 2009, 14:06
80-90 Mem No: 6542
Location: Isle of Arran
Contact:

Re: 1.6 or 2.0?

Post by ajsimmo »



Rosie n' Jim wrote:His 1.9 DG is an auto, no mention of the Aircooled gearbox. 

It's all there in the pic! The yellow plastic label is the dipstick & fill tube for the auto box. I don't think he has a DG any more as he sold it once it became too reliable - hence the desire for an aircold? Image

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk

The Campershack - (website paused)
WBX Rebuilds & Upgrades from the beautiful Isle of Arran

davidoft1
Trader
Posts: 2589
Joined: 27 May 2009, 18:56
80-90 Mem No: 16628
Location: hayling island

Re: 1.6 or 2.0?

Post by davidoft1 »

Pull the air filter box off, it looks like the advance pipe goes to the underneath balance pipe , I can’t see the retard part of the distributor pipe work , the engine seal looks like it may have dropped down the back of the engine tin

Sir Brixalot
Registered user
Posts: 4569
Joined: 15 Oct 2010, 21:55
80-90 Mem No: 8927
Location: London

Re: 1.6 or 2.0?

Post by Sir Brixalot »

ajsimmo wrote: 25 Dec 2020, 13:32
Rosie n' Jim wrote: His 1.9 DG is an auto, no mention of the Aircooled gearbox. 

It's all there in the pic! The yellow plastic label is the dipstick & fill tube for the auto box. I don't think he has a DG any more as he sold it once it became too reliable - hence the desire for an aircold? Image

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
Too reliable and LPG was too cheap.  It really has been 100% reliable since I sold it, thought it would be, I'd done everything, including the gaskets just weeks before selling.  Should have kept it in hindsight but ULEZ would have done for it next year anyway. This van is old enough to be exempt. Are aircooleds less reliable? Need to find out more about engine seals

 
Last edited by Sir Brixalot on 26 Dec 2020, 08:16, edited 1 time in total.
Honorary "Dave" 

 

Rosie n' Jim
Registered user
Posts: 191
Joined: 06 Sep 2020, 06:40
80-90 Mem No: 0

Re: 1.6 or 2.0?

Post by Rosie n' Jim »

Ah, thought the label was just a random sticker, not had an auto myself. Both my Aircooled have been very reliable. Now that was tempting fate!
1982 Holdsworth poptop. 2L CU Aircooled.
1982 Danbury tintop Caravelle. 2L CU Aircooled.

Sir Brixalot
Registered user
Posts: 4569
Joined: 15 Oct 2010, 21:55
80-90 Mem No: 8927
Location: London

Re: 1.6 or 2.0?

Post by Sir Brixalot »

Broke my leg last year and have lots of screws and plate so I need an auto. Early autos aren't very common so I think Ill go and look.  Is the seal from engine to engine bay?  



 
Last edited by Sir Brixalot on 26 Dec 2020, 17:09, edited 1 time in total.
Honorary "Dave" 

 

weimarbus
Registered user
Posts: 808
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 12:53
80-90 Mem No: 10165
Location: coulsdon

Re: 1.6 or 2.0?

Post by weimarbus »

Got to be worth a look, mot history doesn't read too badly, anything that you get at that age will need work and it is an auto :ok
1985 hi-top 2.1MV with DG carb and LPG
1955 trials buggy with 1.9 DG high lift cam and twin dell's (now sold)
1972 1303 beetle
1992 Audi 100 2.8 quattro estate
1967 Vw  Madison kit

Sir Brixalot
Registered user
Posts: 4569
Joined: 15 Oct 2010, 21:55
80-90 Mem No: 8927
Location: London

Re: 1.6 or 2.0?

Post by Sir Brixalot »

If anyone can tell me where all these vacuum pipes should start and finish I'd be grateful. Gave my Haynes away with van and can't see any images online. I see that the big seal runs along the back of the engine bay, what's its purpose?
 
Honorary "Dave" 

 

User avatar
Mocki
Membership Admin
Posts: 16963
Joined: 29 Sep 2005, 09:27
80-90 Mem No: 428
Location: Mansfield Notts
Contact:

Re: 1.6 or 2.0?

Post by Mocki »

Did a quick google , these are the first two that came up showing the vac pipes
Image
Image
Steve
tel / txt O7947-137911
👀
________________

1989 2.1LpgWBX HiTop Leisuredrive Camper
1988 2.1 Caravelle TS TinTop Camper 
 

User avatar
sarran1955
Registered user
Posts: 1441
Joined: 11 Mar 2009, 18:51
80-90 Mem No: 6754
Location: 6, les Hauts de Sarran 19800, Sarran ,Limousin ,FRANCE

Re: 1.6 or 2.0?

Post by sarran1955 »

Hello,

I've done lots of these..

But as a 'radical ' engine builder all the unecessary clat is removed.

My photos are on Flikr and I can't seem to transfer them...but here is a video:


I know the traditionalists will scream, wail, and utter dread warnings...

However I need simple, reliable and cool running...

How much confidence should you have in a 40 year old electromechanical ignition system.. :?:

Thermostat and cooling flaps mechanism....binned.
Vacuum operated pre-heat..binned

More info here
:

You do need, however the engine seal to separate upper and lower compartments. Do you have the under engine tins in place..often missing.. :roll:

If you remove the air cleaner we can get a better looksee.. :wink:

Cordialement,

:ok
Image

Post Reply