New engine (VEGE), worse fuel consumption...?

Big lumps of metals and spanners.

Moderators: User administrators, Moderators

Locked
User avatar
dickie14
Registered user
Posts: 33
Joined: 04 May 2010, 16:07
80-90 Mem No: 13336
Location: Chiswick, West London

New engine (VEGE), worse fuel consumption...?

Post by dickie14 »

Hi all,

This is my first post so sorry if it's a newbie question...

My 2.0 CU recently went nuclear after the oil filter got blocked so I splashed out on a new VEGE engine (Remtec were unavailable at the time).

I'm through the running in period now but my fuel consumption is terrible, about 75% of what I used to get from the original 30yr old lump before it popped! It's down to around 14-16 when I used to get 18-20. It costs me £25 to drive to work and back!

Is this likely to just be because the engine is new and still a bit tight? If not, I'm suspicious it may be carb related - the garage (Beetlelink) had trouble getting them airtight originally but seem to have fixed it - could they have perhaps masked that issue by setting them to run a little rich?

Has anyone else had similarly low mpg from a brand new engine?

PS. Though this is my first post I've been lurking on here for a long time - I've had my van for two years and there isn't a month goes by without me finding some solid gold advice on this forum!
1981 2.0 CU automatic Westy poptop

User avatar
dugcati
Registered user
Posts: 1984
Joined: 15 Aug 2007, 18:23
80-90 Mem No: 3825
Location: Debris
Contact:

Re: New engine (VEGE), worse fuel consumption...?

Post by dugcati »

eloo and welcome! :ok

see if you can get it onto a rolling road as thats the best way to tell whats going on with it


where in the UK are you as there are a couple of mechanics on here that dabble with T25 setups on the side.. theres also the odd one who does it full time too!!
It is by will alone that I set my 'van' in motion!

User avatar
kevtherev
Registered user
Posts: 18830
Joined: 23 Oct 2005, 20:13
80-90 Mem No: 2264
Location: Country estate Wolverhampton Actually

Re: New engine (VEGE), worse fuel consumption...?

Post by kevtherev »

it's nothing to do with tight, and everything to do with carburetters and timing

..and sometimes following set up advice or using a rolling road facility where it can be properly and accurately adjusted
AGG 2.0L 8V. (Golf GTi MkIII)

User avatar
dickie14
Registered user
Posts: 33
Joined: 04 May 2010, 16:07
80-90 Mem No: 13336
Location: Chiswick, West London

Re: New engine (VEGE), worse fuel consumption...?

Post by dickie14 »

Cheers chaps! I think I'll take it back to Beetlelink first and see what they can do with the timing etc, though it was in there only 600 miles ago for it's 'running in' service - I'd have hoped they set it up properly then!

I live in Chiswick, west London, but work in Farnborough so if there's a rolling road or anyone who can help nearby to either it would be good to know!
1981 2.0 CU automatic Westy poptop

armyphil
Registered user
Posts: 1447
Joined: 03 Jan 2009, 19:57
80-90 Mem No: 6328
Location: Huddersfield

Re: New engine (VEGE), worse fuel consumption...?

Post by armyphil »

dickie14 wrote:Cheers chaps! I think I'll take it back to Beetlelink first and see what they can do with the timing etc, though it was in there only 600 miles ago for it's 'running in' service - I'd have hoped they set it up properly then!

I live in Chiswick, west London, but work in Farnborough so if there's a rolling road or anyone who can help nearby to either it would be good to know!

I can vouch for beetlelink very goOd at what they do. There's a vw garage up the road towards Bordon called golftek I think. He knows his way round vw's.

Might be worth popping into him might be an option
You can say alot of of things with "ar"

1984 syncro westfalia

07732299324

Locked