I have one of these coming in as a "nothing to lose so why not" engine, its leaky and down on compression iirc, not actually landed yet as TNT currently mucking me about but when it does, I'll know a bit more!
GW say their spec is 96 bore x 79.5 stroke but only 9:1 compression so barely makes standard DJ power...
https://www.gowesty.com/product/rebuilt ... cc-engine-" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
My initial thoughts are to use the crank & rods (if the latter are aftermarket, depends on the length) with some modified DJ pistons to make a nice punchy high-compression 2.2 and marry it to a later 4-speed that I have knocking about to get my 2wd bus back on the road
Sent from my S60 using Tapatalk
GoWesty wbx2.3 project
Moderators: User administrators, Moderators
-
- Trader
- Posts: 16311
- Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 09:51
- 80-90 Mem No: 6908
- Location: Surrey Syncronaut #156
- Contact:
- axeman
- Registered user
- Posts: 1236
- Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 19:50
- 80-90 Mem No: 6410
- Location: Smeeth kent country side
Re: GoWesty wbx2.3 project
Just make sure you run it on the high octane fuel.
Neil
Neil
Back in the game with an uncut 2wd panel van
-
- Trader
- Posts: 16311
- Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 09:51
- 80-90 Mem No: 6908
- Location: Surrey Syncronaut #156
- Contact:
Re: GoWesty wbx2.3 project
Compared to US gas, all our fuel is high octane!
Sent from my S60 using Tapatalk
Sent from my S60 using Tapatalk
-
- Registered user
- Posts: 161
- Joined: 26 Oct 2015, 12:29
- 80-90 Mem No: 15404
- Location: Portsmouth
Re: GoWesty wbx2.3 project
Why not just put the 2.5 in it Ian? Then I wouldn’t have to keep lifting the engine deck on mine at every VW event for people to see your engine....
1990 LHD 2.5WBX Syncro Krankenwagen
- 937carrera
- Registered user
- Posts: 3599
- Joined: 05 Apr 2015, 19:29
- 80-90 Mem No: 16333
- Location: N Yorks.
Re: GoWesty wbx2.3 project
silverbullet wrote:Compared to US gas, all our fuel is high octane!
Are you sure.......... their octane is MON whereas ours in RON, different measures and MON is a harder test so always comes out with a lower numerical value.
I think they're pretty comparable, though I am not sure if the US has the best quality V-power type fuel.
1981 RHD 2.0 Aircooled Leisuredrive project, CU engine
1990 RHD 1.9 Auto Sleeper with DF/DG engine
1990 RHD 1.9 Auto Sleeper with DF/DG engine
-
- Trader
- Posts: 16311
- Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 09:51
- 80-90 Mem No: 6908
- Location: Surrey Syncronaut #156
- Contact:
Re: GoWesty wbx2.3 project
There are engine plans A, B, C and D all with their own merits... I currently have a "bad debt" fresh 2.5 on the bench, if the customer doesnt stump up some money soon I'll install it but I would rather be paid!philyoung wrote:Why not just put the 2.5 in it Ian? Then I wouldn’t have to keep lifting the engine deck on mine at every VW event for people to see your engine....
This 2.3 is reluctant to arrive, TNT returned it to source as they have changed their T&C's
I am rapidly going off the damn thing tbh
Sent from my S60 using Tapatalk
-
- Trader
- Posts: 16311
- Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 09:51
- 80-90 Mem No: 6908
- Location: Surrey Syncronaut #156
- Contact:
Re: GoWesty wbx2.3 project
The US seem to always have lower-compression ratio versions of European engines (with resultant lower torque/power outputs) and I took that as an indicator of lower RON values in their fuels i.e. it is inferior to that available in Europe.937carrera wrote:silverbullet wrote:Compared to US gas, all our fuel is high octane!
Are you sure.......... their octane is MON whereas ours in RON, different measures and MON is a harder test so always comes out with a lower numerical value.
I think they're pretty comparable, though I am not sure if the US has the best quality V-power type fuel.
Sent from my S60 using Tapatalk